Learning objectives
This short paper seeks to:
inform readers regarding the differences between a Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA) and a PACS
alert readers with regard to some of the issues to consider when evaluating a VNA and comparing one VNA to another
It does not purport to be a definitive statement as to the meaning of Vendor Neutral Archive nor is it an exhaustive or comprehensive assessment of the various ways of designing a VNA and implementing a VNA project.
Background
For as long as the IT infrastructure has been able to support it,
there has been a growing acceptance in the professional medical community that a single,
comprehensive,
digital patient record will lead to better informed and safer diagnoses. If it were universally available at the point of need one could also expect more timely,
effective and efficient treatments. Could this be a great idea whose time has come? Yes,
but,
as is often the case with paradigm-shifting realisations,
making it happen has proved easier...
Imaging findings OR Procedure details
The key features of a VNA compared to PACS may be summarised,
as:
VNA
PACS
(+ other service-based systems)
Patient-centred / trans-departmental
Service-centred department-based
Multiple standards-based – DICOM,
HL7,
non-DICOM etc
DICOM and proprietary PACS-based formats
Seamless interface with RIS,
HIS and EMR
DICOM/HL7 incompatibility issues
Accept,
distribute,
display images and medical information from numerous disparate digital systems anywhere
Accept,
distribute,
display medical images only from and within the (usually proprietary) PACS
Free information / support data-sharing (XDS)
Hold information / inhibit data sharing (limited...
Conclusion
Through a wholesale re-modelling of radiology based on digital technology,
PACS has significantly contributed to increased productivity and improved clinical effectiveness of medical imaging while demonstrating the benefits of integration. Paradoxically,
however,
in successfully realising its potential PACS has also exposed its own limitations. With the radiological model well proven,
the greater clinical community is now becoming aware that a single-specialty or department-based solution is not sufficiently intelligent,
versatile or integrated to address ever increasing demands of the patient within the whole medical enterprise. These...
References
All references used within this paper are based on private and corporate communications.
Personal Information
Declaration of Interest
The author is an employee of
TeraMedica,
Inc. 10400 Innovation Drive Milwaukee WI 53226 USA
TeraMedica,
Inc.
is a manufacturer of vendor neutral archives