Purpose
The aim of this prospective study was to assess the role of whole-body MRI/DWIBS in the staging of new diagnosed lymphoma compared to 18F-FDG-PET/CT,
actually considered gold-standard technique.
Methods and Materials
We enrolled twenty-five consecutive patients with new diagnosed lymphoma histologically confirmed (see the table for the sample’s features).
All of them underwent whole-body MRI (coronal T1-weighted,
coronal STIR and axial DWIBS sequences) and performed 18F-FDG-PET/CT,
within 2 weeks before/later whole-body MRI.
Axial DWIBS sequencesincluded three acquisitions of b factor (0,
500 ,
1000).
The total acquisition time for Whole Body-MRI/DWIBSwas approximately 25 minutes.
Whole Body-MRI/DWIBS was independently evaluated by two blinded observers andlymph nodes largerthan 10 mmin short-axis diameter,
inthe coronal plane on T1-weighted and...
Results
18F-FDG-PET/CT showed 75 nodal stations involved and detected 10 extranodal lesions.
WB-MRI/DWIBS showed 80 nodal stationsinvolved and detected 12 extranodal lesions,
revealing an overstaging in 2/25 (8%) patients and an understaging in 1/25 (4%).
A statistical evaluation with the Cohen k was performed to assess the degree of correlation between the two methods,
for each nodal stations and extranodal sites (see data in the table).
In 10 \ 25 patients we found differences in the attribution of disease in each of the stations described.
Of...
Conclusion
Our initial results show that agreement between whole-body MRI-DWI and18F-FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma staging, is moderate to good.
Although18F-FDG-PET/CT remains the gold standard for lymphoma staging,
WB-MRI/DWIBS may be considered an emergingfunctional whole-body imaging modality that may eventually give complementary informations.
References
J Nucl Med.2010 Oct;51(10):1549-58.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073908.
Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Complementaryrolesofwhole-bodydiffusion-weightedMRIand18F-FDGPET: thestateof theartandpotentialapplications.
Kwee TC,Takahara T,Ochiai R,Koh DM,Ohno Y,Nakanishi K,Niwa T,Chenevert TL,Luijten PR,Alavi A.
Radiol Med.2012 Mar;117(2):293-311.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0708-3.
Epub 2011 Jul 9.
Whole-body MR-DWIBS vs.
[18F]-FDG-PET/CT in the study of malignant tumors: a retrospective study.
Cafagna D,Rubini G,Iuele F,Maggialetti N,Notaristefano A,Pinto D,Niccoli-Asabella A,Palmiotti G,Lasciarrea M,Maggialetti A.
Radiol Med.2009 Feb;114(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0348-4.
Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Whole-bodydiffusion-weightedmagneticresonanceimagingin thestagingofoncologicalpatients:comparisonwithpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomography(PET-CT) in apilotstudy.
[Article in English,
Italian]
Stecco A,Romano G,Negru M,Volpe D,Saponaro A,Costantino S,Sacchetti G,Inglese E,Alabiso O,Carriero A....