Aims and objectives
In our tertiary teaching centre hospitals,
there are two registrars on-call overnight and during the evening,
with three on-call over the weekend.
The out of hours study reports are released to the clinical team as a 'provisional report' and checked by a consultant the following working day.
The registrars have noted a progressive increase in on-call workload.
The aims of this audit were to:
Analyse the registrar discrepancy rate when compared to consultant reports,
and to grade these discrepancies
Compare our discrepancy rates to national...
Methods and materials
All provisional registrar reports from July 2017 were retrospectively analysed.
These included reports from trainees from their first to fifth year of training.
The consultant addendums were used as a 'gold standard'.
We used a 1-5 numerical grading system as set out in table 1,correlating to the Royal college of Radiologists grading system (major vs minor) as labelled.
While grading the discrepancy,
we considered theclinical significance of the delay between provisional report and consultant review.
The RCR national targets are:
2% for major discrepancies (grades...
Results
In total we reviewed 1443 scans,
all of which were performed outside the hours of 9am-5pm Monday to Friday.The results are displayed in fig.
1.
1276 (88.4%) of scans had no discrepancy.
167 (11.6%) of scans contained some level of discrepancy.
4 (0.3%) scans contained a grade 1 discrepancy
13 (0.9%) scans contained a grade 2 discrepancy
150 (10.4%) scans contained a grade 3 discrepancy
Our total rate of major discrepancy was 1.2% (i.e.
below the standard of 2% set by the RCR).
We also...
Conclusion
We found that our rate ofmajor discrepancies was well below the nationaltarget (1.2% vs national target of 2%).
However,
we found our rate of minor discrepancies was above the nationaltarget (10.4% vs national target of 5%),
and that the rate correlates with workload.
We have suggested a number of methods to decrease these discrepancies:
Consultant led teaching on common pitfalls (e.g.
intracranial CTAs).
The (anonymised) discrepancies will also be included in our teaching folder.
Reduction of workload- we have had discussions with the directors of...
Personal information
Dr Aisling Fagan
Dr Sara ffrench-Constant
Dr Aia Mehdi
Dr Cillian McNamara
Registrars,
Department of Radiology,
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust
Dr Maureen Dumba
Neuroradiology fellow,Department of Radiology,
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust
Dr Bryn Jones
Neuroradiology consultant,Department of Radiology,
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Fulham Palace Road
W6 8RF
London
United Kingdom
References
Should registrars be reporting after-hours CT scans? A calculation of error rate and the influencing factors in South Africa. Terreblanche OD,
Andronikou S,
Hlabangana LT,
Brown T,
Boshoff PE.
Acta Radiol.
2012 Feb 1;53(1):61-8.
Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars.
Is it Safe? Briggs,
R.H.
et al.
Clinical Radiology ,
Volume 65 ,
Issue 8 ,
616 - 622
Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? Hillier,
J.C et al.
Clinical Radiology ,
Volume 59...