Keywords:
Treatment effects, MR-Diffusion/Perfusion, MR, Pelvis, Interventional non-vascular, Genital / Reproductive system female, Ablation procedures, Neoplasia
Authors:
V. Zampa, V. Vallini, S. Ortori, F. Porcelli, C. Bartolozzi; Pisa/IT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2011/C-1137
References
[1]. O.
Kilickesmez,
et al.
Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Noral and Diseased Uterine Zones.
Acta Radiol 2009(3)
[2].
Sala E,
et al.
The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis.
Eur J Radiol (2010),
doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.026
[3].
MITSUYOSHI I,
et al.
BLOOD FLOW OCCLUSION VIA ULTRASOUND IMAGE-GUIDED HIGHINTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND AND ITS EFFECT ON TISSUE PERFUSION.
Ultrasound in Med.
& Biol.,
Vol.
33,
No.
3,
pp.
452–459,
2007
[4].
J E KENNEDY,
et al.
High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? The British Journal of Radiology,
76 (2003),
590–599
[5].
Stewart EA,
Gedroyc WM,
Tempany CM,
et al.
Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:48-54
[6].
Ren XL,
Zhou XD,
Zhang J,
et al.
Extracorporeal Ablation of Uterine Fibroids With High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Imaging and Histopathologic Evaluation.
J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26:201–212
