Keywords:
Cardiac, Cardiovascular system, CT, CT-Angiography, Image manipulation / Reconstruction, Comparative studies, Technical aspects, Cardiac Assist Devices
Authors:
F. Tatsugami, T. Higaki, M. Kiguchi, S. Date, K. Awai; Hiroshima/JP
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2013/C-0595
References
1.
Husmann L,
Valenta I,
Gaemperli O,
et al.
Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating.
European heart journal.
2008;29(2):191-197.
2.
Herzog BA,
Husmann L,
Burkhard N,
et al.
Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience.
European heart journal.
2008;29(24):3037-3042.
3.
Roobottom CA,
Mitchell G,
Morgan-Hughes G.
Radiation-reduction strategies in cardiac computed tomographic angiography.
Clinical radiology.
2010;65(11):859-867.
4.
Tatsugami F,
Matsuki M,
Inada Y,
et al.
Feasibility of low-volume injections of contrast material with a body weight-adapted iodine-dose protocol in 320-detector row coronary CT angiography.
Academic radiology.
2010;17(2):207-211.
5.
Hulme KW,
Rong J,
Chasen B,
et al.
A CT acquisition technique to generate images at various dose levels for prospective dose reduction studies.
AJR American journal of roentgenology.
2011;196(2):W144-151.
6.
Einstein AJ,
Moser KW,
Thompson RC, et al.
Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging.
Circulation.
2007;116(11):1290-1305.
7.
Birnbaum BA,
Hindman N,
Lee J,
et al.
Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
Radiology.
2007;242(1):109-119.