Type:
Educational Exhibit
Keywords:
Breast, Oncology, Mammography, Experimental, Comparative studies, Neoplasia
Authors:
P. Clauser1, A. De Nicolò1, V. Londero2, C. Zuiani2, M. Bazzocchi2; 1Udine, Italy/IT, 2Udine/IT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2013/C-1961
References
1.
Lehman CD,
White E,
Peacock S et al.
Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false positive findings.
Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1651–1655
2.
Gur D,
Abrams GS,
Chough DM,
et al.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study AJR 2009;193:586–591
3.
D'Orsi CJ,
Mendelson,
EB,
Ikeda DM,
et al.
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas,
Reston,
VA,
American College of Radiology 2003
4.
Hakim CM,
Chough DM,
Ganott MA,
et al.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic environment: A Subjective Side-by-Side Review AJR 2010;195:172–176
5.
Helvie MA.
Digital Mammography Imaging: Breast Tomosynthesis and Advanced Applications.
Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(5):917–929
6.
Gennaro G,
Toledano A,
di Maggio C,
et al.
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study Eur Radiol 2010;20:1545–1553
7.
Park JM,
Franken EA,
Garg M,
et al.
Breast Tomosynthesis: Present Considerations and Future Applications RadioGraphics 2007; 27:S231–S240