1 Christe A,
Charimo Torrente J,
Lin M,
et al.
Computed-Tomography (CT) screening and follow up of lung nodules: effect of CT-tube current-time,
nodule size and density on detectability of lung nodules and impact of tube current-time on the apparent nodule size.
Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(3):623-30
2 Ko JP,
Rusinek H,
Naidich DP,
et al.
Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection.
Radiology 2003; 228:70 -75
3 Rusinek H,
Naidich DP,
McGuinness et al.
Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT.
Radiology 1998;209(1):243-9
4 Naidich DP,
Rusinek H,
McGuinness G et al.
Variables affecting pulmonary nodule detection with computed tomography: evaluation with three-dimensional computer simulation.
J Thorac Imaging 1993;8(4):291-9
5 Wormanns,
D.,
et al.,
Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT.
Eur Radiol 2005;5(1):14-22
6 Li F,
Arimura H,
Suzuki K,
et al.
Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization.
Radiology 2005; 237:684 -690
7 Armato SG,
Li F,
Giger ML,
MacMahon H,
Sone S,
Doi K.
Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program.
Radiology 2002; 225:685 -692
8 Awai K,
Murao K,
Ozawa A et al.
Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance.
Radiology 2004;230(2):347-52
9 White CS,
Pugatch R,
Koonce T,
Rust SW,
Dharaiya E.
Lung nodule CAD software as a second reader: a multicenter study.
Acad Radiol 2008;15(3):326-4
10 Godoy MC,
Kim TJ,
White CS et al.
Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection Analysis for the Detection of Subsolid and Solid Lung Nodules on Thin- and Thick-Section CT.
Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(1):74-83
11 Roos JE,
Paik D,
Olsen D et al.
Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance.
Eur Radiol 2010;20(3):549-57
12 Das M,
Muhlenbruch G,
Mahnken AH,
et al.
Small pulmonary nodules: effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance.
Radiology 2006;241 : 564–571
13 Lee JW,
Goo JM,
Lee HJ,
Kim JH,
Kim S,
Kim YT.
The potential contribution of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodule detection in multidetector row computed tomography.
Invest Radiol 2004; 39:649 -655
14 Christe A,
Charimo-Torrente J,
Roychoudhury K,
Vock P,
Roos JE.
Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography (CT) for detecting and characterizing the most common CT-patterns of pulmonary disease.
Eur J Radiol.
2012.
[Epub ahead of print]
15 Das M,
Mühlenbruch G,
Heinen S et al.
Performance evaluation of a computer-aided detection algorithm for solid pulmonary nodules in low-dose and standard-dose MDCT chest examinations and its influence on radiologists.
Br J Radiol 2008;81(971):841-7
16 Christe A,
Lin MC,
Yen AC et al.
CT patterns of fungal pulmonary infections of the lung: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose CT.
Eur J Radiol 2012;81(10):2860-6
17 Szucs-Farkas Z,
Schibler F,
Cullmann J et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary CT angiography at low tube voltage: intraindividual comparison of a normal-dose protocol at 120 kVp and a low-dose protocol at 80 kVp using reduced amount of contrast medium in a simulation study.
Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(5)
18 Holmquist F,
Nyman U.
Eightypeak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients.
Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1165-1176
19 Thomas CK,
Muhlenbruch G,
Wildberger JE et al.
Coronary artery calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography: in vitro assessment of a low tube voltage protocol.
Invest Radiol 2006;41:668-673
20 Schueller-Weidekamm C,
Schaefer-Prokop CM,
Weber M,
Herold CJ,
Prokop M.
CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilo-voltage settings.
Radiology 2006;241:899–907
21 Henschke CL,
Yankelevitz DF,
Mirtcheva R et al.
CT Screening for Lung Cancer.
Frequency and Significance of Part-Solid and Nonsolid Nodules.
Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(5):1053-1057
22 Takashima S,
Sone S,
Li F,
Yuichiro et al.
Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (≤1 cm) Detected at Population-Based CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Reliable High-Resolution CT Features of Benign Lesions.
Am J Roentgenol 180:955-964
23 Li F,
Sone S,
Abe H,
MacMahon H,
Doi K.
Malignant versus Benign Nodules at CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Thin-Section CT Findings.
Radiology 2004; 233:3 793-798
24 Jemal A,
Siegel R,
Xu J,
Ward E.
Cancer statistics,
2010.
CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60(5):277–300.
25 Naidich DP,
Bankier AA,
Macmahon H et al.
Recommendations for the Management of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at CT: A Statement from the Fleischner Society.
Radiology 2013;266(1):304-317
26 Zar JH.
Biostatistical analysis,
5th edition,
Pearson Prentice-Hall,
Upper Saddle River,
NJ; 2010;543-555
27 Goldman RN,
Weinberg JS.
Statistics: an introduction Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall,
1985; 334-353
28 Fleiss JL.
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Psychol Bull 1971;76(5):378-83
29 Fleiss JL.
Statistical methods for rates and proportions.
2nd edition,
John Wiley,
New York; 1981;38-46
30 Landis JR,
Koch GG.
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
Biometrics 1977; 33:159–174
31 Hein PA,
Rogalla P,
Klessen C,
Lembcke A,
Romano VC (2009) Computer-aided pulmonary nodule detection - performance of two CAD systems at different CT dose levels.
Rofo 181(11)