Keywords:
Cardiac, Cardiovascular system, CT, CT-Angiography, Dosimetry, Comparative studies, Technical aspects, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
A. Gennarelli1, A. Di Sibio1, V. Felli1, A. Mancini2, F. Di Stasio2, A. V. Giordano2, E. Di Cesare2, C. Masciocchi2; 1L'Aquila, ITALY/IT, 2L'Aquila/IT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2013/C-2662
References
1) N.
Tomizawa; T.
Nojo; M.
Akahane et al.
Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: Assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (2012) 6,
318–324
2) Roh-Eul Yoo; Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee et al.
Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projectionThe International Journal Cardiovascular imaging.
2012 Aug 26.
3)A.
Moscariello; R.A.P.
Takx; U.J.
Schoepf et al.
Coronary CT angiography: image quality,
diagnostic accuracy,
and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection.
Eur Radiol (2011) 21:2130 – 2138.
4) Roh-Eul Yoo; Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee et al.
Image quality of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.
DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0113-6.