1.  Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971;285:1182–86

2.  Folkman J. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;333:1757-1763.

3. Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe DG, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(15):1949-1955.

4. Berg WB et al. Shear-Wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology. 2012;262(2): 435-449

5.  Yoon JH et al. Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results? Eur Radiol. 2013;23(9):2432-40.

6. Tozaki M et al. Shear wave velocity measurements for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses: a comparison between virtual touch quantification and virtual touch IQ. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2233-45.

7. Wojcinski S et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2226-32.

8. Shafer FK et al. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions.  Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(3):254-9.

9. Chang JM et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in thedifferentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(2):W347-56.

10. Hooley RJ et al. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art. Radiology.2013;268(3):642-59

11. Heywang-Kobrunner SH et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: The evolution of breast imaging. The Breast.2013;22(2):S77-82.

12. Peters NH et al. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology.2008; 246(1):116–124

13. Medeiros LR et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat.2011;126(2):273–285

14. Bruening W et al. Noninvasive diagnostic tests for breast abnormalities: update of a 2006 review. [Internet] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD) (2012 Feb) Report No.: 12-EHC014-EF. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews

15. Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology, 257 (1) (2010), pp. 246–253.