This poster is published under an
open license. Please read the
disclaimer for further details.
Keywords:
Head and neck, Nuclear medicine, PET-CT, Outcomes analysis
Authors:
G. Feliciani, F. Fioroni, E. Grassi, M. Bertolini, A. Nitrosi, P. Ciammella, A. Versari, C. Iotti, M. Iori; Reggio Emilia/IT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2015/C-1326
References
[1].Gerlinger M.
et al.
Intratumor eterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.
N Engl J Med.
2012; 366:883-892
[2].Davnal F.
et al.
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insight Imaging. 2012; 3:573-589
[3].Tesar L.
et al.
Medical image analysis of 3D CT images based on extension of Haralick texture feautres.
Comp Med Imag and Graph 2008; 32:513-520
[4].Ben- Haim S.
et al.
18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response. J Nucl Med.
2009; 50:88-99
[5].El Naqua I.
et al. Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predictingcancer treatment outcomes Pattern Recognit 2009; 42(6): 1162-1171
[6].Chua S.
et al.
PET imaging for prediction of response to therapy and outcome in oesophageal carcinoma Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imag 2011; 38:1591-94
[7].Bundschuh R.
A.
et al.
Textural parameters of tumor heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT for therapy response assessmentand prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer J Nucl Med 2014; 55:891-897
[8].Fang D.Y.
et al.
Development and evaluation of an open-source software package “CGITA” for quantifying tumor heterogeneity with molecular imaging,
BioMed Research International 2014