Keywords:
Professional issues, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Digital radiography, Equipment, Audit and standards, Technical aspects, Quality assurance, Image verification
Authors:
L. P. V. Ribeiro, J. Ribeiro, R. P. P. Almeida, S. Rodrigues, A. F. Abrantes, K. B. Azevedo, J. P. Pinheiro, O. Lesyuk; Faro/PT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2016/B-0873
References
1.
Herrmann TL,
Fauber TL,
Gill J,
Hoffman C,
Orth DK,
Peterson P a,
et al.
Best practices in digital radiog radiography.
2012;84(1):83–9.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2298826
2.
Seibert JA.
Computed Radiography Technology [Internet].
Univerdade da California - Davis Medical Center; 2004.
p.
153–75.
Available from: https://www.medicalphysics.org/apps/medicalphysicsedit/seibert1.pdf
3.
Fujifilm Medical Systems.
FUJIFILM Medical Systems CR Users Guide [Internet].
2004.
p.
1–40.
Available from: http://som.missouri.edu/radiology/midasupport/midas2009/mod/cr/pdf/cr-users-guide.pdf
4.
Williams MB,
Krupinski EA,
Strauss KJ,
Breeden WK,
Rzeszotarski MS,
Applegate K,
et al.
Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
J.
Am.
Coll.
Radiol.
[Internet].
2007 Jun [cited 2013 Nov 24];4(6):371–88.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17544139
5.
Mothiram U,
Brennan PC,
Robinson J,
Lewis SJ,
Moran B.
Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement.
J.
Med.
Radiat.
Sci.
[Internet].
2013 Dec 20 [cited 2013 Dec 13];60(4):115–22.
Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jmrs.25