1.
Blokker,
B.M.,
et al.,
35 years of Dutch adult autopsy rates.
Virchows Archiv,
2014.
465: p.
S8-S8.
2.
Shojania,
K.G.,
et al.,
Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time - A systematic review.
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association,
2003.
289(21): p.
2849-2856.
3.
Blokker,
B.M.,
et al.,
Reasoning behind autopsy consents for in-hospital deceased adults.
Virchows Archiv,
2014.
465: p.
S8-S8.
4.
Blokker,
B.,
Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.
European Radiology,
2015.
5.
Yagoda,
W.D.
and E.
Severson,
The Value of Autopsy in Medical Education.
Faseb Journal,
2009.
23.
6.
Bolliger,
S.A.,
et al.,
Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences.
A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects.
European Radiology,
2008.
18(2): p.
273-282.
7.
Lundstrom,
C.,
et al.,
State-of-the-art of visualization in post-mortem imaging.
Apmis,
2012.
120(4): p.
316-326.
8.
Thayyil,
S.,
et al.,
Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study (vol 382,
pg 223,
2013).
Lancet,
2013.
382(9909): p.
1980-1980.
9.
Weustink,
A.C.,
et al.,
Minimally Invasive Autopsy: An Alternative to Conventional Autopsy? Radiology,
2009.
250(3): p.
897-904.
10.
Wichmann,
D.,
et al.,
Virtual Autopsy With Multiphase Postmortem Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Traditional Medical Autopsy to Investigate Unexpected Deaths of Hospitalized Patients.
Annals of Internal Medicine,
2014.
160(8): p.
534.
11.
Roberts,
I.S.D.,
et al.,
Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study.
Lancet,
2012.
379(9811): p.
136-142.
12.
van der Linden,
A.,
et al.,
Post-Mortem Tissue Biopsies Obtained at Minimally Invasive Autopsy: An RNA-Quality Analysis (vol 9,
e115675,
2014).
Plos One,
2015.
10(3).
