Keywords:
Oncology, Pelvis, Genital / Reproductive system male, MR, Staging, Diagnostic procedure, Imaging sequences, Neoplasia
Authors:
B. Yagci, F. Ufuk, E. Sağtaş, P. Cakmak, D. HEREK, A. E. Zumrutbas, N. Sen Turk; Denizli/TR
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2018/C-0800
References
1.
de Rooij M,
Hamoen EH,
Witjes JA,
Barentsz JO,
Rovers MM.
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
Eur Urol.
2016; 70:233-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029.
2.
Kundu SD,
Roehl KA,
Yu X,
et al.
Prostate specific antigen density correlates with features of prostate cancer aggressiveness. J Urol 2007; 177: 505–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.039.
3.
Nowroozi MR,
Momeni SA,
Ohadian Moghadam S,
et al.
Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Gleason Score Predict Adverse Pathologic Features in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Nephrourol Mon 2016; 8:e39984.
4.
Weinreb JC,
Barentsz JO,
Choyke PL,
et al.
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015,
Version 2.
Eur Urol 2016; 69: 16-40
5.
Matsuoka Y,
Ishioka J,
Tanaka H,
et al.
Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System,
Version 2,
on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 209: W76-W84.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17163.
6.
Raskolnikov D,
George AK,
Rais-Bahrami S,
et al.
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy.
J Urol.
2015 Jul; 194: 105-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.072.