1.
Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Eur J Radiol 34:208–219
2.
Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging.
Part I.
Choice of technique,
image interpretation,
diagnostic accuracy,
and transfer to clinical practice.
Radiology 244:356–378 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442051620
3.
Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging.
Part 2.
Clinical applications.
Radiology 244:672–691 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443051661
4.
Sardanelli F,
Boetes C,
Borisch B,
et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group.
Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
5.
Pinker K,
Grabner G,
Bogner W,
et al (2009) A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Invest Radiol 44:553–558 .
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c127
6.
Kuhl CK (2007) Breast MR imaging at 3T.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:315–320,
vi .
doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003
7.
Baltzer PAT,
Kaiser WA,
Dietzel M (2015) Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study.
Eur J Radiol 84:86–91 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.023
8.
Benndorf M,
Baltzer PAT,
Kaiser WA (2011) Assessing the degree of collinearity among the lesion features of the MRI BI-RADS lexicon.
Eur J Radiol 80:e322-324 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.030
9.
Marino MA,
Clauser P,
Woitek R,
et al (2015) A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4075-7
10.
Gutierrez RL,
DeMartini WB,
Eby PR,
et al (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000 .
doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983
11.
Baltzer P a.
T,
Renz DM,
Herrmann K-H,
et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques.
Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1326-5
12.
Marini C,
Iacconi C,
Giannelli M,
et al (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
Eur Radiol 17:2646–2655 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2
13.
Guo Y,
Cai Y-Q,
Cai Z-L,
et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 16:172–178 .
doi: 10.1002/jmri.10140
14.
Yankeelov TE,
Luci JJ,
Lepage M,
et al (2005) Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
Magn Reson Imaging 23:519–529 .
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.013
15.
Dorrius MD,
Dijkstra H,
Oudkerk M,
Sijens PE (2014) Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Radiol 24:2835–2847 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3338-z
16.
Bogner W,
Pinker-Domenig K,
Bickel H,
et al (2012) Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.
Radiology 263:64–76 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111494
17.
Chen X,
Li W,
Zhang Y,
et al (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
BMC Cancer 10:693 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-693
18.
An YY,
Kim SH,
Kang BJ (2017) Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: Added value of the qualitative analysis of breast lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3.0 T.
PloS One 12:e0174681 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174681
19.
Filli L,
Ghafoor S,
Kenkel D,
et al (2016) Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast.
Eur J Radiol 85:274–278 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.009
20.
Partridge SC,
DeMartini WB,
Kurland BF,
et al (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722 .
doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2139
21.
Pinker K,
Moy L,
Sutton EJ,
et al (2018) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Invest Radiol.
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000465
22.
Parsian S,
Rahbar H,
Allison KH,
et al (2012) Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.
Radiology 265:696–706 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112672
23.
Spick C,
Pinker-Domenig K,
Rudas M,
et al (2014) MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.
Eur Radiol 24:1204–1210 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6
24.
Clauser P,
Marcon M,
Maieron M,
et al (2015) Is there a systematic bias of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the breast if measured on different workstations? An inter- and intra-reader agreement study.
Eur Radiol.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4051-2
25.
Arponen O,
Arponent O,
Sudah M,
et al (2015) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs.
Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
PloS One 10:e0138702 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138702
26.
Lambregts DMJ,
Beets GL,
Maas M,
et al (2011) Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Eur Radiol 21:2567–2574 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2220-5
27.
Bickel H,
Pinker K,
Polanec S,
et al (2017) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Eur Radiol 27:1883–1892 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4564-3
28.
Pinker K,
Bickel H,
Helbich TH,
et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.
Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8
29.
Pinker K,
Bogner W,
Baltzer P,
et al (2014) Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging,
diffusion-weighted imaging,
and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Invest Radiol 49:421–430 .
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000029
30.
Bogner W,
Gruber S,
Pinker K,
et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341–351 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532081718
31.
Marino MA,
Helbich T,
Baltzer P,
Pinker-Domenig K (2018) Multiparametric MRI of the breast: A review.
J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 47:301–315 .
doi: 10.1002/jmri.25790
32.
Gulani V,
Calamante F,
Shellock FG,
et al (2017) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations.
Lancet Neurol 16:564–570 .
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8
33.
Pinker K,
Marino MA,
Dr Meyer-Baese A,
Helbich TH (2016) [Multiparametric and molecular imaging of breast tumors with MRI and PET/MRI].
Radiol 56:612–621 .
doi: 10.1007/s00117-016-0129-3
34.
Kul S,
Eyuboglu I,
Cansu A,
Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions.
J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 40:1158–1164 .
doi: 10.1002/jmri.24491
35.
Partridge SC,
Mullins CD,
Kurland BF,
et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673 .
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3534
0 0 1 1247 6860 HSJ 57 16 8091 14.0
36.
Mann RM,
Balleyguier C,
Baltzer PA,
et al (2015) Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information.
Eur Radiol.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z