Keywords:
Neoplasia, Cancer, Outcomes analysis, Observer performance, Diagnostic procedure, MR, Pelvis, Oncology, Genital / Reproductive system male
Authors:
J. Ash-Miles, H. M. A. OBrien, P. Charters, S. HALDAR; Bristol/UK
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-0529
References
1.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014) Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management(Clinical Guideline 175).
Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg175 [Accessed 29 December 2018].
2.PROSTATE CANCER UK.
2016. Prostate Biopsy.
[ONLINE] Available at: https://prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information/prostate-tests/prostate-biopsy.
[Accessed 28 December 2018].
3.Kam SC,
Choi SM,
Yoon S,
et al.
Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: impact of prebiopsy enema. Korean J Urol.
2014;55(11):732-6.
4.Ahmed HU,
El-Shater Bosaily A,
Brown L,
et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
5.High grade PIN.
PathologyOutlines.com website.
http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/prostateHGPIN.html.
Accessed December 30th,
2018.
6.Ito T,
Dulaimi,
E,
Smaldone M.C.
(2016) Chapter 6 -High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Atypical Glands,
Editor(s): Jack H.
Mydlo,
Ciril J.
Godec,
Prostate Cancer (Second Edition),
Academic Press,
Pages 49-62,
ISBN 9780128000779,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00006-2.