1.
American College of Radiology BI-RADS Atlas (2013),
5th Edition.
https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Bi-Rads.
Accessed 15 May 2018
2.
Newstead GM (2010) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:225–240,
viii .
doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.004
3.
Greenwood HI,
Heller SL,
Kim S,
et al (2013) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features.
Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 33:1569–1588 .
doi: 10.1148/rg.336125055
4.
Partridge SC,
DeMartini WB,
Kurland BF,
et al (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722 .
doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2139
5.
Kul S,
Cansu A,
Alhan E,
et al (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210–217 .
doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4258
6.
Baltzer PAT,
Benndorf M,
Dietzel M,
et al (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging,
ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.
Eur Radiol 20:1101–1110 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1654-5
7.
Spick C,
Pinker-Domenig K,
Rudas M,
et al (2014) MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.
Eur Radiol 24:1204–1210 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6
8.
Pinker K,
Bogner W,
Baltzer P,
et al (2014) Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging,
diffusion-weighted imaging,
and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Invest Radiol 49:421–430 .
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000029
9.
Gity M,
Ghazi Moghadam K,
Jalali AH,
Shakiba M (2014) Association of Different MRI BIRADS Descriptors With Malignancy in Non Mass-Like Breast Lesions.
Iran Red Crescent Med J 16: .
doi: 10.5812/ircmj.26040
10.
Tozaki M,
Fukuda K (2006) High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:330–337 .
doi: 10.2214/ajr.187.3.w330
11.
Machida Y,
Tozaki M,
Shimauchi A,
Yoshida T (2015) Two Distinct Types of Linear Distribution in Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Difference in Positive Predictive Value between Linear and Branching Patterns.
Radiology 276:686–694 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141775
12.
Pinker K,
Bickel H,
Helbich TH,
et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.
Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8
13.
Bogner W,
Gruber S,
Pinker K,
et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341–351 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532081718
14.
Ei Khouli RH,
Jacobs MA,
Mezban SD,
et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Radiology 256:64–73 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091367
15.
Yabuuchi H,
Matsuo Y,
Okafuji T,
et al (2008) Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 28:1157–1165 .
doi: 10.1002/jmri.21570
16.
Yabuuchi H,
Matsuo Y,
Kamitani T,
et al (2010) Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Eur J Radiol 75:e126-132 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.013
17.
Baltzer A,
Dietzel M,
Kaiser CG,
Baltzer PA (2015) Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score.
Eur Radiol.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3886-x
18.
Marino MA,
Clauser P,
Woitek R,
et al (2015) A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4075-7