Diagnostic Performance of Reading CT Scan of the Abdomen Using Smartphone Compared to Reading From PACS Workstation to Diagnose Acute Appendicitis.

Congress:

ECR 2019

Poster Number:

C-1778

Type:

Scientific Exhibit

Keywords:

Computer Applications-Teleradiology, Teleradiology, Computer applications, Abdomen, Education and training

Authors:

H. Al Dhuhli¹, M. Al Yahyaai²; ¹Al khod/OM, ²Muscat/OM

DOI:

10.26044/ecr2019/C-1778

DOI-Link:

https://dx.doi.org/10.26044/ecr2019/C-1778

References

1. Drnasin I, Grgic M. The use of mobile phones in radiology. In: Proceedings ELMAR-2010.; 2010:17-21.

2. Rodrigues MA, Visvanathan A, Murchison JT, et al. Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions. Insights Imaging 2013;4:555-562.

3. Bruikbaar S. The free secure messaging app for medical team players. Siilo 2018. Available at: https://www.siilo.com. Accessed October 1, 2018.

4. Anon. DocsInk.com | DocsInk. Available at: https://docsink.com/. Accessed September 17, 2017.

5. Goost H, Witten J, Heck A, et al. Image and Diagnosis Quality of X-Ray Image Transmission via Cell Phone Camera: A Project Study Evaluating Quality and Reliability. PLoS ONE 2012;7. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474770/. Accessed September 17, 2017.

6. Stahl I, Dreyfuss D, Ofir D, et al. Reliability of smartphone-based teleradiology for evaluating thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J 2017;17:161-167.

7. Seong NJ, Kim B, Lee S, et al. Off-Site Smartphone Reading of CT Images for Patients With Inconclusive Diagnoses of Appendicitis From On-Call Radiologists. Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:3-9.

8. Licurse MY, Kim SH, Kim W, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging 2015;28:646-653.

9. Paryavi E, Schwartz BS, Meyer CL, et al. Reliability and Effectiveness of Smartphone Technology for the Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Pediatric Elbow Trauma. J Pediatr Orthop 2016;36:483-487.

10. Ludewig E, Richter A, Frame M. Diagnostic imaging – evaluating image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis. Vet Res Commun 2010;34:473-479.

11. Anon. Anatomical variants and pathologies of the vermix. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4324638/. Accessed May 27, 2018.

12. Anon. Practice Parameters by Modality | American College of Radiology. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards/Practice-Parameters-by-Modality. Accessed September 19, 2018.