Keywords:
Genital / Reproductive system female, Pelvis, MR, Imaging sequences, Cancer
Authors:
B. Sghedoni, F. Fiocchi, M. C. Gibertini, M. G. Vitale, I. Di Monte, L. Botticelli, G. De Marco, P. Torricelli; Modena/IT
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-2393
References
[1]The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging. Freeman SJ,
Aly AM,
Kataoka MY et al. Radiographics 2012; 32(6):1805-27
[2] Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM,
Kumar V,
Shinagare A et al.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol.
2012; 56(1):58-65
[3] Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guideline of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.
Balleyguier C,
Sala E,
De Cunha T et al.
Eur Radiol.
2011; 21(5):1102-10
[4] Apparent diffusion coefficient for prediction of parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: a critical evaluation based on stratification to a Likert scale using T2‑weighted imaging,.
Woo S,
Kym SY,
Cho JY at al.
Radiol.
Med 2018 ;123(3):209-216
[5] MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach.
Nicolet V,
Carignal L,
Bourdon F et al.
Radiographics 2000; 20(6):1539-49.
[6] Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer.
Park JJ,
Kim CK,
Park SY et al.
Eur Radiol.
2014;24(5):1081-8
[7] T2-weighted MRI findings predictive of parametrial involvement in patients with cervical cancer and histologically confirmed full thickness stromal invasion.
Bourgioti C,
Chatoupis K,
Antoniou A,
et al .Hell J Radiol 2018; 3(1): 35-44.
[8] The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer.
Kuang F,
Ren J,
Liyuan F et al.
Eur Radiol 2013; 23(4):1050-8.