[1].
Goodsitt M H,
Chan H P,
Schmitz A,
Zelakiewicz S,
Telang S,
Hadjiiski L,
Watcharotone K,
Helvie M A,
Paramagul C,
Neal C,
Christodoulou E,
Larson S C,
Carson P L. Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images.
Phys.
Med.
Biol. 2014,
Vol.
59,
pp.
5883–5902.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/19/5883.
[2].
van Engen R E,
Bosmans H,
Bouwman R W,
Dance D R,
Heid P,
Lazzari B,
Marshall N,
Schopphoven S,
Strudley C,
Thijssen M A O,
Young K C. Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems: EUREF,
June 2016.
[3].
Petersson H,
Dustler M,
Tingberg A,
Timberg P. Monte Carlo simulation of breast tomosynthesis: visibility of microcalcifications at different acquisition schemes.
Proc.
of SPIE. 2015.
DOI: 10.1117/12.2081942.
[4].
Nelson J S,
Wells J R,
Baker J A,
Samei E. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM? Med.
Phys. 2016,
Vol.
43,
5,
pp.
2538-2547.
doi: 10.1118/1.4947293.
[5].
Taylor,
J R. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. 2nd Edition: University Science Books,
1997.