1.
Fishman MA.
Hydrocephalus.
In: Eliasson SG,
Prensky AL,
Hardin WB,
editor.
Neurological Pathophysiology.
New York: Oxford; 1978.
2.
Carey CM,
Tullous MW,
Walker ML.
Hydrocephalus: Etiology,
pathologic effects,
diagnosis,
and natural history.
In: Cheek WR,
editor.
Pediatric Neurosurgery.
3rd ed.
Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1994.
3.
Dandy WE,
Blackfan KD.
Internal hydrocephalus.
An experimental,
clinical and pathological study.
Am J Dis Child 1914;8:406‑48.
4.
Russell DS.
Observation on the pathology of hydrocephalus.
Medical Research Council.
Special report series No.
265.
London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office,
1949.
p.
112-3.
5.
Kandasamy J,
Jenkinson MD,
Mallucci CL.
Contemporary management and recent advances in paediatric hydrocephalus.
BMJ 2011;343:146‑51.
6.
Krishnamurthy S,
Li J.
New concepts in the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus.
Translat Pediatr 2014;3:185‑94.
7.
Greitz D.
Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: New theories and implications for therapy.
Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:145‑65.
8.
Kartal MG,
Algin O.
Evaluation of hydrocephalus and other cerebrospinal fluid disorders with MRI: An update.
Insights Imaging 2014;5:531‑41.
9.
Dinçer A,
Kohan S,
Özek MM.
Is all “Communicating”
hydrocephalus really communicating? Prospective study on the value of 3D‑constructive interference in steady state sequence at 3T.
Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1898‑906.
10.
Algin O,
Turkbey B.
Evaluation of aqueductal stenosis by three‑dimensional sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip‑angle evolutions (3D‑SPACE) sequence: Preliminary results with 3 Tesla MRI.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:740‑6.
11.
Jeevanandham B,
Kalyanpur T,
Gupta P,
Cherian M.
Comparison of post‑contrast 3D‑T1‑MPRAGE,
3D‑T1‑SPACE and 3D‑T2‑FLAIR MR images in evaluation of meningeal abnormalities at 3‑T MRI.
Br J Radiol 2017;90:20160834.
12.
Desai SB.
SWI,
a new MRI sequence‑how useful it is?.
Indian J Radiol Imaging 2006;16:13‑4.
13.
Haacke EM,
Mittal S,
Wu Z,
Neelavalli J,
Cheng YC.
Susceptibility‑weighted imaging: Technical aspects and clinical applications,
part 1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:19‑30.
14.
Barbosa JH,
Santos AC,
Salmon CE.
Susceptibility weighted imaging: Differentiating between calcification and hemosiderin.
Radiol Bras 2015;48:93‑100.
15.
Ucar M,
Tokgoz N,
Damar C,
Alimli AG,
Oncu F.
Diagnostic performance of heavily T2‑weighted techniques in obstructive hydrocephalus: Comparison study of two different 3D heavily T2‑weighted and conventional T2‑weighted sequences.
Japn J Radiol 2015;33:94‑101.
16.
Thomas B,
Somasundaram S,
Thamburaj K,
Kesavadas C,Gupta AK,
Bodhey NK,
et al.
Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain — a pictorial review.
Neuroradiology 2008;50:105‑16.
17.
Algin O.
Evaluation of hydrocephalus patients with 3D‑SPACE technique using variant FA mode at 3T.
Acta Neurol Belg 2018;118:169‑78.
18.
Liang L,
Korogi Y,
Sugahara T,
Shigematsu Y,
Okuda T,
Ikushima I,
et al.
Detection of intracranial hemorrhage with susceptibility‑weighted MR sequences.
Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1527‑34.
19.
Chavadi C,
Bele K,
Venugopal A,
Rai S.
Susceptibility weighted imaging: A novel method to determine the etiology of aqueduct stenosis.
IJNS 2016;05:044‑6.
20.
Tisell M,
Almström O,
Stephensen H,
Tullberg M,
Wikkelsö C.
How effective is endoscopic third ventriculostomy in treating adult hydrocephalus caused by primary aqueductal stenosis? Neurosurgery 2000;46:104‑10.
21.
Lapras C,
Mertens P,
Guilburd JN,
Lapras C Jr,
Pialat J,
Patet JD.
Choroid plexectomy for the treatment of chronic infected hydrocephalus.
Childs Nerv Syst 1988;4:139‑43.
22.
Hoppe‑Hirsch E,
Laroussinie F,
Brunet L,
Sainte‑Rose C,
Renier D,
Cinalli G,
et al.
Late outcome of the surgical treatment of hydrocephalus.
Childs Nerv Syst 1998;14:97‑9.