1.
Budoff MJ,
Dowe D,
Jollis JG,
Gitter M,
Sutherland J,
Halamert E,
et al.
Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the Prospective Multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724–32.
2.
Gueret P,
Deux J-F,
Bonello L,
Sarran A,
Tron C,
Christiaens L,
et al.
Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (from the Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study).
Am J Cardiol.
2013 Feb 15;111(4):471–8.
3.
Husmann L,
Leschka S,
Desbiolles L,
Schepis T,
Gaemperli O,
Seifert B,
et al.
Coronary Artery Motion and Cardiac Phases: Dependency on Heart Rate—Implications for CT Image Reconstruction.
Radiology.
2007 Nov 1;245(2):567–76.
4.
Hirai N,
Horiguchi J,
Fujioka C,
Kiguchi M,
Yamamoto H,
Matsuura N,
et al.
Prospective versus Retrospective ECG-gated 64-Detector Coronary CT Angiography: Assessment of Image Quality,
Stenosis,
and Radiation Dose.
Radiology.
2008 Aug 1;248(2):424–30.
5.
Leipsic J,
Labounty TM,
Hague CJ,
Mancini GBJ,
O’Brien JM,
Wood DA,
et al.
Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr.
2012 May 1;6(3):164–71.
6.
Fan L,
Zhang J,
Xu D,
Dong Z,
Li X,
Zhang L.
CTCA Image Quality Improvement by Using Snapshot Freeze Technique Under Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiographic Gating.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
2015 Apr;39(2):202.
7.
Pontone G,
Muscogiuri G,
Baggiano A,
Andreini D,
Guaricci AI,
Guglielmo M,
et al.
Image Quality,
Overall Evaluability,
and Effective Radiation Dose of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Prospective Electrocardiographic Triggering Plus Intracycle Motion Correction Algorithm in Patients With a Heart Rate Over 65 Beats Per Minute.
J Thorac Imaging.
2018 Jul;33(4):225–31.
8.
Lijuan F,
Fengwei S,
Jiwang Z,
Dongsheng X,
Donghai F,
Liren Z.
Effect of snapshot freeze motion correction algorithm on image quality of coronary CT angiography without heart rate control.
Chin J Radiol.
2014;48(2):105–8.
9.
Earls JP,1,
Leipsic JA,2,
Dowe D,3,
Okerlund D,4,
Dutta S,4,
Scheske J.2.
Evaluation of a Novel Method to Reduce Motion Artifacts on Coronary CT Angiography: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.
10.
Lee JW,
Kim CW,
Lee G,
Lee HC,
Kim S-P,
Choi BS,
et al.
Hybrid ECG-gated versus non-gated 512-slice CT angiography of the aorta and coronary artery: image quality and effect of a motion correction algorithm.
Acta Radiol.
2018 Feb 1;59(2):170–9.
11.
Sheta HM,
Egstrup K,
Husic M,
Heinsen LJ,
Lambrechtsen J.
Impact of a motion correction algorithm on quality and diagnostic utility in unselected patients undergoing coronary CT angiography.
Clin Imaging.
2016 Mar 1;40(2):217–21.
12.
Fuchs TA,
Stehli J,
Dougoud S,
Fiechter M,
Sah B-R,
Buechel RR,
et al.
Impact of a New Motion-Correction Algorithm on Image Quality of Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Insufficient Heart Rate Control.
Acad Radiol.
2014 Mar 1;21(3):312–7.
13.
Bischoff B,
Geyer LL,
Reiser MF,
Lisse UGM.
Improved Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography Using Automatic Motion Correction.
Arch Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet].
2015 [cited 2018 Feb 15];3(2).
Available from: http://cardiovascimaging.com/en/articles/20652.html
14.
Machida H,
Lin X-Z,
Fukui R,
Shen Y,
Suzuki S,
Tanaka I,
et al.
Influence of the motion correction algorithm on the quality and interpretability of images of single-source 64-detector coronary CT angiography among patients grouped by heart rate.
Jpn J Radiol.
2015 Feb 1;33(2):84–93.
15.
Andreini D,
Pontone G,
Mushtaq S,
Bertella E,
Conte E,
Baggiano A,
et al.
Multidetector computed tomography angiography evaluation of coronaries arteries with intracycle motion correction algorithm.
Eur Heart J.
2013 Aug 1;34(suppl 1):P2936.
16.
Bhagalia R,
Pack JD,
Miller JV,
Iatrou M.
Nonrigid registration-based coronary artery motion correction for cardiac computed tomography.
Med Phys.
2012 Jul 1;39(7Part1):4245–54.
17.
Li Q,
Li P,
Su Z,
Yao X,
Wang Y,
Wang C,
et al.
Effect of a novel motion correction algorithm (SSF) on the image quality of coronary CTA with intermediate heart rates: Segment-based and vessel-based analyses.
Eur J Radiol.
2014 Nov 1;83(11):2024–32.
18.
Andreini D,
Lin FY,
Rizvi A,
Cho I,
Heo R,
Pontone G,
et al.
Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Coronary CT Angiography Algorithm: Prospective Multicenter Validation of an Intracycle CT Motion Correction Algorithm for Diagnostic Accuracy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2018 Apr 18;1–8.
19.
Nett BE,
Pack JD,
Okerlund D.
Task based assessment of a motion compensation algorithm via simulation of a moving stenotic vessel.
In: Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging [Internet].
International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2013 [cited 2018 May 7].
p.
86682B.
Available from: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/8668/86682B/Task-based-assessment-of-a-motion-compensation-algorithm-via-simulation/10.1117/12.2006593.short
20.
Morsbach F,
Gordic S,
Desbiolles L,
Husarik D,
Frauenfelder T,
Schmidt B,
et al.
Performance of turbo high-pitch dual-source CT for coronary CT angiography: first ex vivo and patient experience.
Eur Radiol.
2014 Aug 1;24(8):1889–95.
21.
Iatrou M,
Pack J,
Bhagalia R,
Bequé D,
Seamans J.
Coronary artery motion estimation and compensation: A feasibility study.
IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec.
2010 Oct 1;