Type:
Educational Exhibit
Keywords:
Staging, Diagnostic procedure, MR, Pelvis, Oncology, Cancer
Authors:
S. Sridi1, H. Zaghouani1, W. Yacoub1, S. Majdoub1, F. bouzayene1, N. Chouchene1, T. Rziga2, D. Bakir1; 1Sousse/TN, 2Sousse, tunisia/TN
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-3634
References
1. Sala E,
Wakely S,
Senior E,
Lomas D.
MRI of malignant neoplasm of the uterine corpus and cervix. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1577–87.
2. Pannu HK,
Corl FM,
Fishman EK.
CT evaluation of cervical cancer: Spectrum of disease. RadioGraphics. 2001;21:1155–68.
3. Son H,
Kositwattanarerk A,
Hayes MP,
Chuang L,
Rahaman F,
Heiba S,
et al.
PET/CT evaluation of cervical cancer: Spectrum of disease. Radio Graphics. 2010;30:1251–68.
4. Feong YY,
Kang HK,
Chung TW,
Seo FF,
Park FG.
Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MRI imaging findings. Radio Graphics. 2003;23:969–81.
5. De Bondt RB,
Nelemans PJ,
Bakers F,
Casselman JW,
Peutz-Kootstra C,
Kremer B,
et al.
Morphological MRI criteria improve the detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of MRI features of cervical lymph nodes. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:626–33.
6. Eifel PJ,
Berek JS,
Markman MA.
Cervical cancer.
In: DeVita VT,
Lawrence TS,
Rosenberg SA,
editors. Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. 9th ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011.
pp.
1311–35.