Type:
Educational Exhibit
Keywords:
MR, CT, Liver, Abdomen, Abdominal Viscera, Contrast agent-intravenous, Diagnostic procedure, Education, Education and training, Not applicable
Authors:
A. V. Neagu, C.-I. Betianu; Bucharest/RO
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2020/C-06611
References
1. Schneider G, Grazioli SL, Saini S, eds. Hepatic pseudolesions. In: MRI of the Liver: Imaging Techniques, Contrast Enhancement, Differential Diagnosis. 2nd edn. Milan: Springer-Verlag Italia 2006: 152-185.
2. Kobayashi, Satoshi & Gabata, Toshifumi & Matsui, Osamu. (2010). Radiologic manifestation of hepatic pseudolesions and pseudotumors in the third inflow area. Imaging in Medicine. 2. 10.2217/iim.10.50.
3. Itai Y, Matsui O. 'Nonportal' splanchnic venous supply to the liver: abnormal findings on CT, US and MRI. Eur Radiol 1999;9:237-43. 10.1007/s003300050661.
4. Hamer OW, Aguirre DA, Casola G, Lavine JE, Woenckhaus M, Sirlin CB (2006) Fatty liver: imaging patterns and pitfalls. Radiographics 26:1637–1653.
5. Desser, T.S. Understanding transient hepatic attenuation differences. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2009;30:408–417.
6. Colagrande S, Centi N, La Villa G, Villari N. Transient hepatic attenuation differences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 459– 64.
7. Narla LD, Newman B, Spottswood SS, Narla S, Kolli R. Inflammatory pseudotumor. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:719–729.
8. Bleibel W, Curry MP. Peliosis hepatis. In: UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2010. January 2020.