Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: How it can affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?

Congress:

ECR 2020

Poster Number:

C-06738

Type:

Educational Exhibit

Keywords:

Breast, Mammography, Contrast agent-intravenous, Artifacts, Not applicable, Performed at one institution

Authors:

G. BICCHIERAI¹, C. Vignoli¹, D. De Benedetto¹, F. Di Naro¹, M. kaur Gill², V. Miele³, J. Nori¹; ¹FIRENZE/IT, ²Klang/MY, ³Florence/IT

DOI:

10.26044/ecr2020/C-06738

DOI-Link:

https://dx.doi.org/10.26044/ecr2020/C-06738

References

References

1. Nori J, Kaur M (2018) Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94553-8

2. E.M. Fallenberg, F.F. Schmitzberger, H. Amer, et Al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus mammography and MRI—clinical performance in a multireader evaluation, Eur. Radiol. 7 (2017): 2752-64.

3. Lalji, U. C., et al. (2015). "Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria." Eur Radiol 25(10): 2813-2820.

4. Bhimani C, Li L, Liao L, et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Modality-Specific Artefacts and Other Factors Which May Interfere with Image Quality. Acad Radiol 24:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.024

5. Yagil Y, Shalmon A, Rundstein A, et al (2016) Challenges in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography interpretation: Artefacts lexicon. Clin Radiol 71:450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.012

6. Bicchierai G, Nori J, De Benedetto D et al.Role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the post biopsy management of B3 lesions: Preliminary results. Tumori. 2019 Oct;105(5):378-387.

7. Jayadevan R, Armada MJ, Shaheen R, Mulcahy C (2015) Optimizing Digital Mammographic Image Quality for Full-Field Digital Detectors: Artefacts Encountered during the QC Process1. 2080–2089. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150036

8. Geiser WR, Haygood TM, Santiago L, et al (2011) Challenges in mammography: Part 1, artefacts in digital mammography. Am J Roentgenol 197:1023–1030. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7246

9. Gluskin AJ, Click M, Fleischman R, et al (2017) Contamination Artefact that Mimics In-situ Carcinoma on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Eur J Radiol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.002

10. Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, et al (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21:565–574. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1944-y