Keywords:
Cardiovascular system, CT-Angiography, Contrast agent-intravenous, Dosimetry, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
A. Kosmala, T. Gassenmaier, S. Veldhoen, A. Kunz, T. A. Bley, B. Petritsch; Würzburg/DE
References
Remy-Jardin M,
Pistolesi M,
Goodman LR,
et al.
Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society.
Radiology.
2007;245:315–329.
Johnson TRC,
Krauss B,
Sedlmair M,
et al.
Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.
Eur Radiol.
2007;17:1510–1517.
Thieme SF,
Johnson TRC,
Lee C,
et al.
Dual-energy CT for the assessment of contrast material distribution in the pulmonary parenchyma.
Am J Roentgenol.
2009;193:144–149.
Bauer RW,
Kerl JM,
Weber E,
et al.
Lung perfusion analysis with dual energy CT in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism--influence of window settings on the diagnosis of underlying pathologies of perfusion defects.
Eur J Radiol.
2011;80:e476–e482.
Bauer RW,
Kramer S,
Renker M,
et al.
Dose and image quality at CT pulmonary angiography-comparison of first and second generation dual-energy CT and 64-slice CT.
Eur Radiol.
2011;21:2139–2147.
De Zordo T,
Von Lutterotti K,
Dejaco C,
et al.
Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: High-pitch dual source CT,
dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT.
Eur Radiol.
2012;22:279–286.
Sabel BO,
Buric K,
Karara N,
et al.
High-Pitch CT Pulmonary Angiography in Third Generation Dual-Source CT: Image Quality in an Unselected Patient Population.
PLoS One.
2016;11:e0146949.