1.
Hulten EA,
Carbonaro S,
Petrillo SP,
Mitchell JD,
Villines TC.
Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2011 Mar 8;57(10):1237-47.
2.
Jaarsma C,
Leiner T,
Bekkers SC,
Crijns HJ,
Wildberger JE,
Nagel E,
et al.
Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography,
cardiac magnetic resonance,
and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2012 May 8;59(19):1719-28.
3.
Takx RA,
Blomberg BA,
El Aidi H,
Habets J,
de Jong PA,
Nagel E,
et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.
2015 Jan;8(1):10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666.
4.
Rossi A,
Merkus D,
Klotz E,
Mollet N,
de Feyter PJ,
Krestin GP.
Stress Myocardial Perfusion: Imaging with Multidetector CT.
Radiology.
2014 Jan;270(1):25-46.
5.
Flohr TG,
De Cecco CN,
Schmidt B,
Wang R,
Schoepf UJ,
Meinel FG.
Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery disease: state-of-the-art imaging techniques.
Radiol Clin North Am.
2015 Mar;53(2):271-85.
6.
Boiselle PM,
Choe YH,
Leipsic J,
Pugliese F,
Schoepf UJ,
Vliegenthart R.
Expert opinion: How and when to perform CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
J Thorac Imaging.
2015 May;30(3):167-8.
7.
Bamberg F,
Marcus RP,
Becker A,
Hildebrandt K,
Bauner K,
Schwarz F,
et al.
Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2014 Mar;7(3):267-77.
8.
Ho KT,
Ong HY,
Tan G,
Yong QW.
Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion measurements of resting and hyperaemic blood flow in low-risk subjects with 128-slice dual-source CT.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.
2015 Mar;16(3):300-6.
9.
Kono AK,
Coenen A,
Lubbers M,
Kurata A,
Rossi A,
Dharampal A,
et al.
Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow.
Invest Radiol.
2014 Dec;49(12):801-7.
10.
Tanabe Y,
Kido T,
Uetani T,
Kurata A,
Kono T,
Ogimoto A,
et al.
Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography.
Eur Radiol.
2016 Feb 6.
11.
Wichmann JL,
Meinel FG,
Schoepf UJ,
Lo GG,
Choe YH,
Wang Y,
et al.
Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2015 Jul;205(1):W67-72.
12.
Wichmann JL,
Meinel FG,
Schoepf UJ,
Varga-Szemes A,
Muscogiuri G,
Cannao PM,
et al.
Semiautomated Global Quantification of Left Ventricular Myocardial Perfusion at Stress Dynamic CT:: Diagnostic Accuracy for Detection of Territorial Myocardial Perfusion Deficits Compared to Visual Assessment.
Acad Radiol.
2016 Apr;23(4):429-37.
13.
Pelgrim GJ,
Dorrius M,
Xie X,
den Dekker MA,
Schoepf UJ,
Henzler T,
et al.
The dream of a one-stop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT.
Eur J Radiol.
2015 Jan 10.
14.
Langendorff O.
Untersuchungen am überlebenden Säugertierherzen.
Plügers Arch.
1895;61:291-332.
15.
de Hart J,
de Weger A,
van Tuijl S,
Stijnen JM,
van den Broek CN,
Rutten MC,
et al.
An ex vivo platform to simulate cardiac physiology: a new dimension for therapy development and assessment.
Int J Artif Organs.
2011 Jun;34(6):495-505.
16.
Cerqueira MD,
Weissman NJ,
Dilsizian V,
Jacobs AK,
Kaul S,
Laskey WK,
et al.
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart.
A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.
Circulation.
2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42.