[1] Pauwels R,
Theodorakou C,
Walker A,
Bosmans H,
Jacobs R,
Horner K and Bogaerts R 2012 Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index Dentomaxillofacial Radiol.
41 583–93
[2] IAEA Technical Reports Series no: 457.
Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice.
2007.
[3] European Commission.
Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence Based Guidelines.
Radiation Protection Publication 172.
2012
[4] Araki K,
Patil S,
Endo A,
Okano T.
Dose indices in dental cone beam CT and correlation with dose-area product.
Dentomaxillofac Radiology.
2013;42:20120362.
[5] Kralik I,
Faj D,
Lauc T,
Škarica M,
Popić J,
Brkić H.
Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
J Radiol Prot.
2018;38(4):1412
[6] Zubal IG,
Harrell CR,
Smith EO,
Smith AL,
Krischlunas P.
Two dedicated software,
voxel-based,
anthropomorphic (torso and head) phantoms.
In: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Voxel Phantom Development held at the National Radiological Protection Board,
Chilton,
UK.
1995.
p.
6–7.
[7] Zubal IG,
Harrell C,
Smith E.
Zubal phantom data.
Voxel-based anthropomorphic phantoms.
2003;
[8] IAEA Safety Standards Series No.
SSG-46: Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionising Radiation - Specific Safety Guide.
2018.
