Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2020
Keywords:
Performed at one institution, Not applicable, Prospective, Tissue characterisation, Computer Applications-3D, Image manipulation / Reconstruction, CT, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Pelvis, Foetal imaging, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
DOI:
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-00469
References
1)Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM,Mclntire DD, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and prediction of labor dystocia. Obset Gynecol 2005 Nov; (5 pt 1): 919-926.
2)Sporri S, Thoeny HC, Raio L, et al. MRI imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 Jul; 179(1): 137-144.
3)Toru Higaki, Kazuo Awai. Low-dose Technique for Chest and Abdominal CT Examinations. NICHIDOKU-IHO 2016; vol.61(1): 41-51.
4)Kelaranta A, Makela T, Kaasalainen T, et al. Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy – Monte Carlo study. Phys Med. 2017 Nov; 43: 199-206.
5)Martinsen AC, Risdal M, Bay T, Drolsum A, et al. Pelvimetry with compute tomography. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005; Aug: 11;125(15): 2023-5.
6)Erika Phexell, Marcus Soderberg, Anetta Bolejko, et al. Estimation of foetal radiation dose in a comparative study of pelvimetry with conventional radiography and different computer tomography methods. International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy 2018; 5 (4): 243-247.
7)S. Aubry, P. Padoin, Y. Petegnief, et al. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2018; 99(9), 569-576.