Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2020
Keywords:
Performed at one institution, Cross-sectional study, Retrospective, Dosimetric comparison, Safety, Dosimetry, CT, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Paediatric, Abdomen, Action 7 - Radiation protection of children
Authors:
H. F. L. Verelst, M. Aertsen, H. Bosmans
DOI:
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-02153
References
1. Lira D, Padole A, Kalra MK, Singh S. Tube Potential and CT Radiation Dose Optimization. Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2014 Dec 24;204(1):W4–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13281
2. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye S-J, Park CM, Chun EJ, et al. Radiation Dose Modulation Techniques in the Multidetector CT Era: From Basics to Practice. RadioGraphics [Internet]. 2008 Sep 1;28(5):1451–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.285075075
3. D. MR, L. KP, J. CM. Size‐based protocol optimization using automatic tube current modulation and automatic kV selection in computed tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys [Internet]. 2016 Jan 8;17(1):328–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5756
4. Nations U. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2013 Report [Internet]. UN; 2014. (Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation : UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes). Available from: https://books.google.be/books?id=M-FBngEACAAJ
5. European Guidelines on DRLs for Paediatric Imaging Revised. 2016 March. Available from http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/pidrl