Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2020
Keywords:
Action 4 - Dose management systems, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Digital radiography, Comparative studies, Quality assurance, Prospective, Diagnostic or prognostic study, Performed at one institution
Authors:
M. Wurm, S. Tschauner, E. Sorantin
DOI:
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-10476
References
1. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289-296.
2. Willis CE, Slovis TL (2005) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR
and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams–a white
paper conference. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:373–374.
3. Journy N., Lee C., Harbron R. et al. Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990–2020. Br J Cancer 116, 109–116 (2017).
4. D. Kostova-Lefterova, D. Taseva, J. Hristova-Popova, J. Vassileva, Optimisation of paediatric chest radiography, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Volume 165, Issue 1-4, July 2015, Pages 231–234.
5. Guo H, Liu W., He X. et al. Optimizing Imaging Quality and Radiation Dose by the Age-Dependent Setting of Tube Voltage in Pediatric Chest Digital Radiography. Korean J Radiol 2013;14(1):126-13.
