1. Hovda T, Holen ÅS, Lång K, Albertsen JL, Bjørndal H, Brandal SHB, Sahlberg KK, Skaane P, Suhrke P and Hofvind S. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway. Radiology 2019;191337
2. Bernardi D, Gentilini MA, De Nisi M, Pellegrini M, Fantò C, Valentini M, Sabatino V, Luparia A and Houssami N. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation. Breast 2019; S0960-9776(19)30561-2.
3. Conant EF, Barlow WE, Herschorn SD, Weaver DL, Beaber EF, Tosteson ANA, Haas JS, Lowry KP, Stout NK, Trentham-Dietz A, diFlorio-Alexander RM, Li CI, Schnall MD, Onega T, Sprague BL; Population-based Research Optimizing Screening Through Personalized Regimen (PROSPR) Consortium. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5(5):635-642
4. Svahn TM,Houssami N, Sechopoulos I and Mattsson S. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digitalmammography. Breast 2015;24:93-99
5. Paulis LE, LobbesMB, Lalji UC et al. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:679-685
6. Gennaro G, Bernardi D and Houssami N. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis. Eur Radiol 2018;28:573-581
7. Dance DR, Young KC and van Engen RE. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009;54:4361-4372
8. Dance DR, Young KC and van Engen RE.Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys.Med. Biol. 2011;56:453-471