Type:
Presentación Electrónica Educativa
Authors:
A. Matilla Muñoz, M. Pina Pallin, A. Hermosin Pena, J. Galvan Fernandez, R. Petruzzella Lacave, N. Andres Garcia; Valladolid/ES
DOI:
10.1594/seram2014/S-0699
Bibliografía
Tirkes T,
Hollar MA,
Tann M,
et al.
Response Criteria in Oncologic Imaging: Review of Traditional and New Criteria.
RadioGraphics 2013; 33:1323–1341
Eisenhauer EA,
Therasse P,
Bogaerts J,
et al.
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228–247
Nishino M,
Jagannathan JP,
Ramaiya NH,
et al.
Revised RECIST Guideline Version 1.1: What Oncologists Want to Know and What Radiologists Need to Know.
AJR 2010; 195:281–289
Choi H,
Charnsangavej C,
Faria SC,
et al.
Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria.
J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1753–1759
Wahl RL,
Jacene H,
Kasamos Y,
et al.
From RECIST to PERCIST:
evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid
tumors.
J Nucl Med.
2009; 50 no.
Suppl 1 122S-150S
Smith AD,
Shah SN,
Rini BI,
et al.
Morphology,
Attenuation,
Size,
and Structure (MASS) Criteria: Assessing Response and Predicting Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma on Antiangiogenic Targeted Therapy.
AJR 2010; 194:1470–1478