2023 ASM / C-285
A retrospective evaluation of the dosimetric parameters; Conformity Index and Gradient Index for patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT
Keywords:
Oncology, Cone beam CT, Dosimetry, Cancer
Authors:
N. Mitina, T. Peterson, R. Guidi, C. Hargrave
DOI:
10.26044/ranzcr2023/C-285
References
- ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams. Oxford University press July 2017
- H. Acar et al. Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry 47 (2022) 348–355
- J. Yang et al. Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases. Medical Dosimetry 41(2016)105–112
- F. Li et al. Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT? J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23:e13458.
- S. Aljabab et al. Comparison of four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: Dosimetric and efficiency analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:2:160–167
- B. Cox et al. International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 19.
- L. Wilke et al. ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beam. Strahlenther Onkol (2019) 195:193–198
- A. Sahgal et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22: 1023–33