Aims and objectives
Breast density is normally evaluated with mammography using the BI-RADS lexicon,
which is a subjective semi-quantitative classification [1].
Two main points regarding mammographic density should be taken into account: the so called “masking effect”,
i.e.
increased breast density reduces sensitivity in cancer detection,
and the role of breast density as an independent risk factor for breast cancer [2][3][4].
For these reasons in the latest years there is a growing interest not only for breast imaging not only in terms of identification of breast cancer but...
Methods and materials
In this retrospective study a total of 111 women (mean age 54.3 years; range 37-82 years) who underwent digital breast mammography and contrast-enhanced breast MRI in our institution were included.
Three radiologists in consensus (>4 years experience in breast imaging) scored MBD and BPEql according to the ACR classification (Fig.
1).
BPEql was evaluated by reviewing the second post-contrast images (90 s after contrast injection) using the subtracted images.
In order to perform the MRBD measurements,
free-hand regions-of-interest (ROIs) were drawn along the edges of...
Results
Mean MRBD values across the different MBD categories were as follows:
category A (mean ± SD 5.30±0.75%; range,
4.04-6.97%);
category B (6.51±1.05%; 4.76-8.95%);
category C (10.92±2.56%; 5.92-16.49%);
category D (23.73±8.95%; 12.03-53.95%).
Values were significantly different among all the MBD categories (p<0.005),
except the A versus B.
Mean BPEqn across the different BPEql categories were as follows:
minimal (12.15±9.17; 0.64-36.51);
mild (17.58±9.20; 1.19-40.49);
moderate (20.56±9.34; 2.97-39.27);
marked (34.69±13.39; 15.80-52.74).
Values were significantly different between minimal versus moderate category and marked versus all the others (Fig.
3)....
Conclusion
According to the previous literature our results showed a moderate correlation between BD and BPE both at the qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
Use of Dixon sequences represents a new promising and simple method for a volumetric and quantitative estimation of the breast density at MR imaging; further validation using an automatic segmentation method is necessary in order to support its routine clinical application.
References
American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BIRADS ® Atlas).
V Edition.
Reston,
Va: © American College of Radiology; 2013.
Wolfe JN.
Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.
AJR Am Roentgenol 1976;126(6):1130–1137.
Freer PE.
Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.
Radiographics 2015; 35(2):302-15.
Boyd NF,
Martin LJ,
Yaffe MJ,
Minkin S.
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.
Breast Cancer Res 2011;13(6):223.
Khazen M,Warren RM,...