1.Abdulrahman GO Jr,
Rahman GA.
Epidemiology of breast cancer in Europe andAfrica.
J Cancer Epidemiol 2012:915610.
2.Tabár L,
Vitak B,
Chen TH,
et al.
Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.
Radiology 2011 ;260:658-663.
3.Jørgensen KJ,
Keen JD,
Gøtzsche PC.
Is mammographic screening justifiableconsidering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?Radiology 2011 ;260:621-627.
4.Hooley RJ,
Greenberg KL,
Stackhouse RM,
et al. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Radiology 2012 ;265:59-69.
5.Pisano ED,
Hendrick RE,
Yaffe MJet al.
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
Radiology- 2008 ;246:376-383.
6.Kolb TM,
Lichy J,
Newhouse JH.
Occult cancer in women with dense breasts:detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.Radiology- 1998 ;207:191-199.
7.Alakhras M,
Bourne R,
Rickard M et al.
Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging? Clin Radiol- 2013;68:225-236.
8.Skaane P,
Bandos AI,
Gullien R et al.
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
Radiology- 2013 ;267:47-56.
9.European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening.En: Perry N,
Broeders M,
de Wolf C,
Törnberg S,
Holland R,
von Karsa L,
editors.
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
4 th edition.
Chapter 2.
Luxemburg: European Communities; 2006.
p.57-165.
10.Andreu FJ,
Sáez A,
Sentís M et alBreast core biopsy reporting categories--An internal validation ina series of 3054 consecutive lesions.
Breast-2007 ;16:94-101.
11.Skaane P,
Hofvind S,
Skjennald A.
Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
Radiology- 2007 ;244:708-717.
12.Crystal P,
Strano SD,
Shcharynski S et al.
Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.
AJR Am J Roentgenol- 2003 ;181:177-182.
13.Zonderland HM,
Coerkamp EG,
Hermans J et al.
Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.
Radiology- 1999 ;213:413-422.
14.Kaplan SS.
Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.
Radiology- 2001 ;221:641-649.
15.Corsetti V,
Houssami N,
Ferrari A et al.
Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives,
and associated cost.
Eur J Cancer- 2008 ;44:539-544.
16.Houssami N,
Skaane P.
Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.
Breast 2013 ;22:101-108.
17.
Giuliano V,
Giuliano C.
Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic womenusing 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
ClinImaging- 2013 ;37:480-486.