This poster is published under an
open license. Please read the
disclaimer for further details.
Keywords:
Radioprotection / Radiation dose, CT, Cone beam CT, Comparative studies, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
J. Neubauer1, C. Neubauer1, M. Langer1, E. Kotter1, J. M. Voigt2, M. Fiebich2; 1Freiburg/DE, 2Gießen/DE
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2015/C-1457
References
1.
Neubauer J,
Voigt JM,
Lang H,
et al.
(2014) Comparing the Image Quality of a Mobile Flat-Panel Computed Tomography and a Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.
Investig Radiol 49:491–497.
2.
Loubele M,
Bogaerts R,
Van Dijck E,
et al.
(2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Eur J Radiol 71:461–468.
3.
Silva MAG,
Wolf U,
Heinicke F,
et al.
(2008) Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133:640–1.
4.
Schulze D,
Heiland M,
Thurmann H,
Adam G (2004) Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography,
cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 33:83–86.
5.
Kyriakou Y,
Kolditz D,
Langner O,
et al.
(2011) [Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality].
RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Geb der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nukl 183:144–153.
6.
Hofmann E,
Schmid M,
Lell M,
Hirschfelder U (2014) Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
J Orofac Orthop = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie : Organ/official J Dtsch Ges für Kieferorthopädie 75:384–398.