1.
Latib A,
Colombo A,
Sangiorgi GM.
Bifurcation stenting: current strategies and new devices.
Heart 2009;95:495-504.
2.
Moses JW,
Leon MB,
Popma JJ et al.
Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery.
N Engl J Med 2003;349:1315-23.
3.
Jensen JS,
Galloe A,
Lassen JF et al.
Safety in simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
The nordic bifurcation study 14-month follow-up results.
EuroIntervention 2008;4:229-33.
4.
Maeng M,
Holm NR,
Erglis A et al.
Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:30-4.
5.
Steigen TK,
Maeng M,
Wiseth R et al.
Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study.
Circulation 2006;114:1955-61.
6.
Ferenc M,
Gick M,
Kienzle RP et al.
Randomized trial on routine vs.
provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:2859-67.
7.
Hildick-Smith D,
de Belder AJ,
Cooter N et al.
Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old,
new,
and evolving strategies.
Circulation 2010;121:1235-43.
8.
Erglis A,
Kumsars I,
Niemela M et al.
Randomized comparison of coronary bifurcation stenting with the crush versus the culotte technique using sirolimus eluting stents: the Nordic stent technique study.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:27-34.
9.
Foin N,
Alegria-Barrero E,
Torii R et al.
Crush,
culotte,
T and protrusion: which 2-stent technique for treatment of true bifurcation lesions? - insights from in vitro experiments and micro-computed tomography.
Circ J 2013;77:73-80.
10.
Ormiston JA,
Webster MW,
Webber B,
Stewart JT,
Ruygrok PN,
Hatrick RI.
The "crush" technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insights from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployments.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:351-7.
11.
Ormiston JA,
Webster MW,
El Jack S et al.
Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: bench testing of provisional side-branch strategies.
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2006;67:49-55.
12.
Ge L,
Iakovou I,
Cosgrave J et al.
Treatment of bifurcation lesions with two stents: one year angiographic and clinical follow up of crush versus T stenting.
Heart 2006;92:371-6.
13.
Ehara M,
Surmely JF,
Kawai M et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography.
Circ J 2006;70:564-71.
14.
Nikolaou K,
Knez A,
Rist C et al.
Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-7.
15.
Lim HB,
Hur G,
Kim SY et al.
Coronary stent fracture: detection with 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients and in vitro.
Radiology 2008;249:810-9.
16.
Foin N,
Torii R,
Mortier P et al.
Kissing balloon or sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provisional stenting of bifurcations: lessons from micro-computed tomography and computational simulations.
JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2012;5:47-56.
17.
Foin N,
Torii R,
Alegria E et al.
Location of side branch access critically affects results in bifurcation stenting: Insights from bench modeling and computational flow simulation.
International journal of cardiology 2013;168:3623-8.
18.
Murasato Y.
Impact of three-dimensional characteristics of the left main coronary artery bifurcation on outcome of crush stenting.
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2007;69:248-56.
19.
Di Vito L,
Yoon JH,
Kato K et al.
Comprehensive overview of definitions for optical coherence tomography-based plaque and stent analyses.
Coronary artery disease 2014;25:172-85.
20.
Pracon R,
Opolski MP,
Mintz GS et al.
Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of stent strut distribution and fracture: an integrated analysis of the taxus IV,
V,
and VI trials.
The Journal of invasive cardiology 2014;26:501-11.
21.
Chiastra C,
Morlacchi S,
Gallo D et al.
Computational fluid dynamic simulations of image-based stented coronary bifurcation models.
Journal of the Royal Society,
Interface / the Royal Society 2013;10:20130193.
22.
Williams AR,
Koo BK,
Gundert TJ,
Fitzgerald PJ,
LaDisa JF,
Jr.
Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation.
Journal of applied physiology 2010;109:532-40.
23.
Taylor AJ,
Cerqueira M,
Hodgson JM et al.
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography.
A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force,
the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography,
the American College of Radiology,
the American Heart Association,
the American Society of Echocardiography,
the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology,
the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging,
the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,
and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2010;4:407 e1-33.