This poster is published under an
open license. Please read the
disclaimer for further details.
Keywords:
Radiation safety, CT-Angiography, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
K. Bates, A. K. Tootell, A. England, K. Szczepura; Salford, Manchester/UK
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2016/C-2394
References
[1] R.
M.
Joemai,
D.
Zweers,
W.
R.
Obermann et al.,
“Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy,” AJR Am J Roentgenol,
192(4),
881-6 (2009).
[2] D.
L.
Miller,
E.
Vañó,
G.
Bartal et al.,
“Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology,” J Vasc Interv Radiol,
21(5),
607-15 (2010).
[3] S.
A.
Cremen,
and J.
P.
McNulty,
“The availability of appropriately fitting personal protective aprons and jackets for angiographic and interventional radiology personnel,” Radiography,
20(2),
126-130 (2014).
[4] ICRP,
[ICRP Publication 103],
(2007).
[5] R.
Kloeckner,
D.
P.
dos Santos,
J.
Schneider et al.,
“Radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions,” Eur J Radiol,
82(12),
2253-7 (2013).
[6] Kyotokagaku,
[Multipurpose Chest Phantom N1 “Lungman”].
[7] H.
a.
S.
C.
I.
Centre,
[Statistics on obesity,
physical activity and diet – England 2014],
(February 26,
2014).
[8] Mavig,
[X-Ray protection & system solutions].
[9] H.
Wallace,
C.
J.
Martin,
D.
G.
Sutton et al.,
“Establishment of scatter factors for use in shielding calculations and risk assessment for computed tomography facilities,” J Radiol Prot,
32(1),
39-50 (2012).
