Keywords:
Radiographers, Cardiac, MR, Segmentation, Outcomes
Authors:
D. Monteiro1, C. Cabral2, I. Tavares2, S. De Francesco2, J. Mancio3, N. Bettencourt de Sousa4, P. M. Martins2; 1Vila Nova Gaia/PT, 2Aveiro/PT, 3Oxford /UK, 4Porto/PT
DOI:
10.1594/ecr2018/C-2479
References
[1] Barreto-Filho JA,
Wang Y,
Dodson JA,
Desai MM,
Sugeng L,
Geirsson A,
Krumholz HM.
Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States,
1999-2011.
JAMA.
2013; 310:2078–2085.doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282437.
[2] Pai RG,
Varadarajan P,
Razzouk A.
Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2008; 86:1781–1789.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.008.
[3] Kulik A,
Burwash IG,
Kapila V,
Mesana TG,
Ruel M.
Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Circulation.
2006; 114 (suppl): I553–I558.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001180.
[4] Connolly HM,
Oh JK,
Schaff HV,
Roger VL,
Osborn SL,
Hodge DO,
Tajik AJ.
Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients.
Circulation.
2000; 101:1940–1946.
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.16.1940.