1. Berghmans T.
et al.
Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project //Journal of Thoracic Oncology.
– 2008.
– Т.
3.
– №.
1.
– С.
6-12.
2. Chae E.
J.
et al.
Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience //Radiology.
– 2008.
– Т.
249.
– №.
2.
– С.
671-681.
3. Chae E.
J.
et al.
Dual-energy computed tomography characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules //Journal of thoracic imaging.
– 2010.
– Т.
25.
– №.
4.
– С.
301-310.
4. Coursey C.
A.
et al.
Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work,
what can it tell us,
and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? //Radiographics.
– 2010.
– Т.
30.
– №.
4.
– С.
1037-1055.
5. De Wever W.
et al.
Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone,
PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT //European radiology.
– 2007.
– Т.
17.
– №.
1.
– С.
23-32.
6. Downey R.
J.
et al.
Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection //Journal of Clinical Oncology.
– 2004.
– Т.
22.
– №.
16.
– С.
3255-3260.
7. Goo J.
M.,
Park C.
M.,
Lee H.
J.
Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma //American Journal of Roentgenology.
– 2011.
– Т.
196.
– №.
3.
– С.
533-543.
8. Guedj N.
et al.
Angiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodelling in bronchioloalveolar carcinomas: distinctive patterns in mucinous and non‐mucinous tumours //Histopathology.
– 2004.
– Т.
44.
– №.
3.
– С.
251-256.
9. Hansell D.
M.
et al.
Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging //Radiology.
– 2008.
– Т.
246.
– №.
3.
– С.
697-722.
10. Hartman R.
et al.
Applications of dual-energy CT in urologic imaging: an update //Radiologic Clinics.
– 2012.
– Т.
50.
– №.
2.
– С.
191-205.
11. Johnson T.
R.
C.
et al.
Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience //European radiology.
– 2007.
– Т.
17.
– №.
6.
– С.
1510-1517.
12. Kawai T.
et al.
Can Dual-energy CT Evaluate Contrast Enhancement of Ground-glass Attenuation?: Phantom and Preliminary Clinical Studies //Academic radiology.
– 2011.
– Т.
18.
– №.
6.
– С.
682-689.
13. Kaza R.
K.
et al.
Dual-energy CT with single-and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract //Radiographics.
– 2012.
– Т.
32.
– №.
2.
– С.
353-369.
14. Kaza R.
K.,
Platt J.
F.,
Megibow A.
J.
Dual-energy CT of the urinary tract //Abdominal imaging.
– 2013.
– Т.
38.
– №.
1.
– С.
167-179.
15. Ko J.
P.
et al.
Dual-energy computed tomography: concepts,
performance,
and thoracic applications //Journal of thoracic imaging.
– 2012.
– Т.
27.
– №.
1.
– С.
7-22.
16. Kritsaneepaiboon S.
et al.
MDCT pulmonary angiography evaluation of pulmonary embolism in children //American Journal of Roentgenology.
– 2009.
– Т.
192.
– №.
5.
– С.
1246-1252.
17. Li M.
et al.
Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of thyroid nodule specimens: comparison with pathologic findings //Investigative radiology.
– 2012.
– Т.
47.
– №.
1.
– С.
58-64.
18. Miles K.
A.,
Griffiths M.
R.,
Fuentes M.
A.
Standardized perfusion value: universal CT contrast enhancement scale that correlates with FDG PET in lung nodules //Radiology.
– 2001.
– Т.
220.
– №.
2.
– С.
548-553.
19. Ogawa M.
et al.
Dual-energy CT can evaluate both hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and lesion vascularity with a single scan at 60 seconds after contrast medium injection //Academic radiology.
– 2012.
– Т.
19.
– №.
8.
– С.
1003-1010.
20. Orlacchio A.
et al.
Solitary pulmonary nodules: morphological and metabolic characterisation by FDG-PET-MDCT //La radiologiamedica.
– 2007.
– Т.
112.
– №.
2.
– С.
157-173.
21. Pansini V.
et al.
Assessment of lobar perfusion in smokers according to the presence and severity of emphysema: preliminary experience with dual-energy CT angiography //European radiology.
– 2009.
– Т.
19.
– №.
12.
– С.
2834.
22. Pontana F.
et al.
Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients //Academic radiology.
– 2008.
– Т.
15.
– №.
12.
– С.
1494-1504.
23. Schmid-Bindert G.
et al.
Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT? //European radiology.
– 2012.
– Т.
22.
– №.
1.
– С.
93-103.
24. Sieren J.
C.
et al.
Recent technological and application developments in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for improved pulmonary nodule detection and lung cancer staging //Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
– 2010.
– Т.
32.
– №.
6.
– С.
1353-1369.
25. Silva A.
C.
et al.
Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging //Radiographics.
– 2011.
– Т.
31.
– №.
4.
– С.
1031-1046.
26. Uehara T.
et al.
A three-dimensional analysis of blood vessels in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma //Lung.
– 2004.
– Т.
182.
– №.
6.
– С.
343-353.
27. Victoria T.
et al.
Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in a pediatric population with high clinical suspicion //Pediatric radiology.
– 2009.
– Т.
39.
– №.
1.
– С.
35-41.
28. Yeh B.
M.
et al.
Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen //American Journal of Roentgenology.
– 2009.
– Т.
193.
– №.
1.
– С.
47-54.
29. Zhang L.
J.
et al.
Dual-energy CT imaging of thoracic malignancies //Cancer Imaging.
– 2013.
– С.
81.
30. Zhang L.
J.
et al.
Liver virtual non-enhanced CT with dual-source,
dual-energy CT: a preliminary study //European radiology.
– 2010.
– Т.
20.
– №.
9.
– С.
2257-2264.