Keywords:
Cardiac, CT-Quantitative, MR-Diffusion/Perfusion, Technology assessment, Ischaemia / Infarction
Authors:
M.-X. Yang, Z.-G. Yang, Y.-K. Guo, H.-Y. Xu, K. Liu, C. Fu, X.-S. Li, L. Zhang, L. Chen; Chengdu/CN
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-0848
References
1.
Tanabe Y,
Kido T,
Uetani T,
et al.
Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography.
Eur Radiol.
2016;26(11):3790-3801.
2.
Goto Y,
Kitagawa K,
Uno M,
et al.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Endocardial-to-Epicardial Myocardial Blood Flow Ratio for the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease With Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
Circ J.
2017;81(10):1477-1483.
3.
Sørgaard MH,
Linde JJ,
Kühl JT,
et al.
Value of Myocardial Perfusion Assessment With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Recent Acute-Onset Chest Pain.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.
2018;11(11):1611-1621.
4.
Pontone G,
Andreini D,
Guaricci AI,
et al.
Quantitative vs.
qualitative evaluation of static stress computed tomography perfusion to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.
2018;19(11):1244-1252.