Keywords:
Contrast agents, CT, MR, Contrast agent-intravenous, Contrast agent-oral, Contrast agent-other, Quality assurance, Outcomes
Authors:
A. A. Janjua1, E. Loney2; 1Darlington, England/UK, 2Darlington/UK
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-1702
Results
Results:
Baseline Audit:
Results (Figure 1) showed that none of the doctors were able to score a hundred percent and the average score obtained was 16.34(65.36%) with the lowest score recorded to be 12(48%) and highest score of 21(84%) scored twice ,
Candidates were mainly struggling to answer questions in relation to vagal reactions and bronchoconstriction.
Dosage of the medication in different scenarios apart from anaphylaxis and Cardiac arrest was also answered correctly occasionally.
Re-Audit:
Our mean score (Figure 2) out of 25 showed a significant improvement to 24.43(97.72%).
Candidates were mainly able to answer all the questions correctly and there was fluctuation in the score of 24 and 25 with two occasions where a score of 23 was achieved with no specific question that the candidates were struggling with. Figure 3 shows the improvement in our results pre and post intervention.