Keywords:
Oncology, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, CT, Diagnostic procedure, Radiation safety, Dosimetric comparison
Authors:
P. De Marco, D. Origgi, C. Rampinelli, V. Giannetta, L. Borrelli, M. Bellomi; Milan/IT
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2019/C-2945
References
1.
Siegel RL,
Miller KD,
Jemal A.
Cancer statistics,
2015. CA Cancer J
Clin 2015;65:5-29.
2.
Preston DL,
Ron E,
Tokuoka S,
et al.
Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res 2007;168(1):1-64
3.
National Research Council.
Health risks from exposure to low levels of
ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—phase 2.National Academies Press,
2006.
4.
Mc Collough CH,
Primak AN,
Braun N,
et al.
Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.
Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47(1):27-40
5.
Nelson RC,
Feuerlein S,
Boll DT.
New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5;286-292
6.
Willemink MJ,
de Jong PA,
Leiner T,
et al.
Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1623-1631
7.
Fleischmann D,
Boas FE.
Computed tomography-old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 2011;21:510-517