1.Humphries PD,
Simpson JC,
Creighton SM,
Hall Craggs MA.
MRI in the assessment of congenital vaginal anomalies .
Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 442-8.
2.Brown MA,
Mattrey RF,
Stamato S,
Sirlin CB.
MRI of the female pelvis using vaginal ge l.
Am J Roentgen 2005; 185: 1221-7.
3.Tak e uch i H ,
Kuw ats uru R,
Kitade M,
e t al.
A novel technique using magnetic resonance imaging jelly for evaluation of rectovaginal endometriosis .
Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 442-7.
4.
Ferreira DM,
Bezerra ROF,
Ortega CD,
Blasbalg R,
Viana PCC,
Meneze MR,
Rocha MS.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the vagina: an overview for radiologists with emphasis on clinical decision making. Radiol Bras .
2015 Jul/Aug; 48(4): 249 -59 .
5.
Sala E,
Wakely S,
Senior E,
Lomas D.
MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2007; 188(6): 1577-87.
6.
Balle yguier C,
Sala E,
Da Cunha T,
et al.
Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol.
2011; 21(5): 1102-10.
7. Bhosale P,
Peungje s ada S,
Devine C,
Balachandran A,
Iyer R.
Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
2010; 34(6): 855-64.
8.
P.
Loubeyre ,
P.
Petignat,
S.
Jacob,
J.
Egger,
J. Dubuisson,
and J.
Wenger,
“Anatomic distribution of posterior deeply infiltrating endometriosis on MRI after vaginal and rectal gel opacification,” American Journal of Roentgenology 2009 ; 19 2(6):1625-31
9.
S.
C.
Ribeiro,
R.
A.
Tormena,
T.
V.
Peterson et al.,“Mullerian duct anomalies: review of current management,” Sao Paulo Me dical Journal 2009; 127(2):9 2-6.
10.
A.
H .
Heger,
L.
Ticson,
L.
Guerra et al.,
“Appearance of the genitalia in girls elected for non abuse: review of hymenal morphology and nonspecific findings,
” Journal of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology 2002; 15(1): 27-35.
11.
Opoku BK,
Djokoto R,
Owusu-Bempah A,
Amo-Antwi K.
Huge abdominal mass secondary to transverse vaginal septum and cervical dysgenesis. Ghana Med J.
2011; 45: 174-6.
12.
Props AM,
Hill JA 3rd.
Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss .
Semin Reprod Med 2000; 18(4): 341-50.
13.
Laufer MR,
Goldste in DP,
Hendren W H .
Structural abnormalities of the female reproductive tract.
In: Emans SJ,
Laufer MR,
Goldstein DP,
eds.
Pediatric and adolescent gynecology.
5th ed.
Boston,
Mass: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
2005; 362-416.
14.Lopez C,
Balogun M,
Ganesan R,
Olliff JF.
MRI of vaginal conditions .
Clin Radiol 2005; 60(6):648-62.
15.
H addad B,
Louis -Sylvestre C,
Poitout P,
Paniel BJ.
Longitudinal vaginal septum: a retrospective study of 202 cases .
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74(2):197-9 .
16.
Troiano RN,
McCarth y SM.
Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Imaging and Clinical Issues.
Radiology. 2004; 233(1):19 -34.
17.
Fiaschetti V,
Crusco S,
Meschini A,
et al.
Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: Evaluation of retrocervical space on MRI after vaginal opacification.
EurJ Radiol Nov 2012; 81(11): 3638-45.
18.
Rock JA,
Zacur H A,
Dlugi AM.
Pregnancy success following surgical correction of imperforate hymen and complete transverse vaginal septum .
Obstet Gyne col.
1982; 59 (4): 448-53.
19.
Junqueira B,
Alle n L,
Spitzer R,
Lucco K,
Babyn P,
Doria A.
Müllerian Duct Anomalies and Mimics in Children and Adolescents: Correlative Intraoperative Assessment with Clinical Imaging.
RadioGraphics.
2009; 29 (4): 1085-103.
20. Comparison of Transvaginal Sonography,
Saline Infusion Sonography,
and Hysteroscopy in Premenopausal Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography.
2000;16(4):172-9 .