Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2016
Keywords:
Action 7 - Medical radiation protection research: MELODI, EURAMED, Action 9 - Facilitation of research in advanced topics of radiation protection
Authors:
G. Ivanac, Z. Brnić, J. Petrovic, M. Cavka, I. Bušić-Pavlek, B. Brkljacic
DOI:
10.1594/esi2016/ESI-0024
References
1.
Williams MB,
Raghunathan P,
More MJ,
et al.
Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Medical Physics.
2008;35(6):2414-2423.
doi:10.1118/1.2912177.
2.
Klausz R,
Schramchenko N.
Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry.
2005;114(1-3):369-74.
3.
Chevalier M, Morán P, Ten JI, Fernández Soto JM, Cepeda T, Vañó E.
Patient dose in digital mammography.
Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2471-9.
4.
European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images [Internet].
Brussels (BE): European Comission; 1996. Available from: http://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ fp5-euratom/docs/eur16260.pdf.
5.
Pushpa TR,
Vijayalakshmi K,
Sulaiman T,
Kanaga KC.
Comparison of image quality criteria between digital storage phosphor plate in mammography and full-field digital mammography in the detection of breast cancer.
Malays J Med Sci.
2012;19(1):52-59.
6.
Vyborny CJ.
Image quality and the clinical radiographic examination.
RadioGraphics.
1997;17(2):479–498.
7.
Eklund GW1,
Cardenosa G.
The art of mammographic positioning.
Radiol Clin North Am.
1992 Jan;30(1):21-53.