Congress:
EuroSafe Imaging 2020
Keywords:
Performed at one institution, Experimental, Not applicable, Quality assurance, Education, Diagnostic procedure, CT, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Professional issues, Abdomen, Action 3 - Image quality assessment based on clinical indications
Authors:
A. Fedusenko, M. Takha, O. Nikitina, V. Novokhatchenko
DOI:
10.26044/esi2020/ESI-05471
References
1. Padole A, Ali Khawaja RD, KalraMK, Singh S. CT Radiation Dose and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques. AJR2015 204:4, W384-92.
2. Sagara et al. Abdominal CT: Comparison of Low-Dose CT With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and Routine-Dose CT With Filtered Back Projection in53 Patients. AJR 2010; 195:713-719.
3. Geyer LL et al: State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology 2015 276:2,339-357.
4. Prakash et al. Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique. Invest Radiol 2010;45: 202-210.
5. Chenggong Yanet al.Radiation Dose Reduction by Using CT with Iterative Model Reconstruction in Patients with Pulmonary Invasive Fungal Infection. Radiology 2018 288:1, 285-292
6. Achille Mileto, Luis S. Guimaraes, Cynthia H. McCollough, Joel G. Fletcher, and Lifeng Yu.State of the Art in Abdominal CT: The Limits of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms.
Radiology 2019 293:3, 491-503.
7. Justin Solomon, Daniele Marin, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury, Bhavik Patel, and Ehsan Samei. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model–based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm. Radiology 2017 284:3, 777-787.