1 Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology 253:520-531

2 Bly R, Jahnen A, Järvinen H, Olerud H, Vassileva J, Vogiatzi S (2015) Collective effective dose in Europe from X-ray and nuclear medicine procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 165:129-132

3 Le Coultre R, Bize J, Champendal M et al (2016) EXPOSURE OF THE SWISS POPULATION BY RADIODIAGNOSTICS: 2013 REVIEW. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 169:221-224

4 Pola A, Corbella D, Righini A et al (2018) Computed tomography use in a large Italian region: trend analysis 2004-2014 of emergency and outpatient CT examinations in children and adults. Eur Radiol 28:2308-2318

5 Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499-505

6 Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

7 Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700-707

8 Mayo-Smith WW, Morin RL (2017) Image Wisely: The Beginning, Current Status, and Future Opportunities. J Am Coll Radiol 14:442-443

9 Boylan JK (2018) Image Gently. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1193-1195

10 Morel B, Bouëtté A, Lévy P et al (2016) Optimization of the pediatric head computed tomography scan image quality: Reducing dose with an automatic tube potential selection in infants. J Neuroradiol 43:398-403

11 Kim HG, Lee HJ, Lee SK, Kim HJ, Kim MJ (2017) Head CT: Image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children. Eur Radiol 27:3609-3617

12 Chen Y, Liu Z, Li M et al (2018) Reducing both radiation and contrast doses in coronary CT angiography in lean patients on a 16-cm wide-detector CT using 70 kVp and ASiR-V algorithm, in comparison with the conventional 100-kVp protocol. Eur Radiol. 10.1007/s00330-018-5837-9

13 Papadakis AE, Damilakis J (2018) Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality. Invest Radiol. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000537

14 Aurumskjöld ML, Söderberg M, Stålhammar F, von Steyern KV, Tingberg A, Ydström K (2018) Evaluation of an iterative model-based reconstruction of pediatric abdominal CT with regard to image quality and radiation dose. Acta Radiol 59:740-747

15 Li J, Udayasankar UK, Toth TL, Seamans J, Small WC, Kalra MK (2007) Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:547-552

16 Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP (2007) The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys 34:3093-3101

17 Gudjonsdottir J, Svensson JR, Campling S, Brennan PC, Jonsdottir B (2009) Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning. Acta Radiol 50:1035-1041

18 Matsubara K, Koshida K, Ichikawa K et al (2009) Misoperation of CT automatic tube current modulation systems with inappropriate patient centering: phantom studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:862-865

19 Habibzadeh MA, Ay MR, Asl AR, Ghadiri H, Zaidi H (2012) Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. Phys Med 28:191-199

20 Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Lampinen A, Kortesniemi M (2013) Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT--phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 43:673-684

21 Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M (2014) Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123-130

22 Kaasalainen T, Mäkelä T, Kortesniemi M (2019) The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT equipments. Eur J Radiol Open 6:24-32

23 Filev PD, Mittal PK, Tang X et al (2016) Increased Computed Tomography Dose Due to Miscentering With Use of Automated Tube Voltage Selection: Phantom and Patient Study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45:265-270

24 Kataria B, Sandborg M, Althén JN (2016) IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 169:130-135

25 Saltybaeva N, Alkadhi H (2017) Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms. Med Phys 44:5697-5704

26 Marsh RM, Silosky MS (2017) The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study. Med Phys 44:1514-1524

27 Winslow J, Zhang Y, Koweek L, Samei E (2018) Dependency of prescribed CT dose on table height, patient size, and localizer acquisition for one clinical MDCT. Phys Med 55:56-60

28 Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M et al (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41:1-322

29 Dauer LT, Hamada N, Blakely EA (2017) National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Commentary Number 26: Impact of Revised Guidance on Radiation Protection for the Lens of the Eye. J Am Coll Radiol 14:980-982