1.
American College of Radiology (1995) ACR-SPR practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis.
2.
iPatient.
Patient-centered CT imaging: New methods for patient-specific optimization of image quality and radiation dose.
In: Philips Healthcare,
editor.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV.
Netherlands2012.
3.
Ardley ND,
Lau KK,
Buchan K.
Efficacy of average water equivalent diameter measurements to standardise image quality and dose in Abdominal CT In: Monash Health,
editor.
Monash Imaging.
Melbourne 2014.
4.
Menke J.
Comparison of Different Body Size Parameters for Individual Dose Adaptation in Body CT of Adults.
Radiology.
2005;236:565–71.
5. Hayton A,
Wallace A,
Marks P,
Edmonds K,
Tingey D,
Johnston P.
Australian diagnostic reference levels for multidetector computed tomography.
AustralasPhysEngSci Med (2013) 36:19-26.
6.
Gkanatsios N,
Huda W,
Peters.
Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Med Phys.
2002;29(8):1643-1650.
7.
Kalra MK,
Maher MM,
Blake MA,
Lucey BC,
Karau K,
Toth TL,
Avinash G,
Halpern EF,
Saini S.
Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images post processed with noise reduction filters. Radiology 2001;232:791-791.
8. Leipsic J,
Labounty TM,
Heilbron B,
Min JK,
Mancini GB,
Lin FY,
Taylor C,
Dunning A,
Earls JP.
Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study.AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2010 Sep;195(3):655-60.
9. Thibault JB,
Sauer KD,
Bouman CA,
Hsieh J.
A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT.
Med Phys.
2007 Nov;34(11):4526-44.
10. Toth TL.
Dose reduction opportunities for CT scanners. Paediatric Radiology 2002;32:261-267.
Yu T,
Zhu X,
Tang L,
Wang D,
& Saad N (2007) Review of CT angiography of aorta.
Radiol Clin North Am 45(3):461-483.
11.
Ouwendijk R,
Kock M,
van Dijk L,
van Sambeek M,
Stijnen T,
& Hunink M (2006) Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: Effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors.
Radiology 241(2):603-608.
12.
Oh CW,
Lau K,
Buchan K,
Ardley N.
‘Efficacy of fine focal spot scanning in CT abdominal angiography’ European Radiology 2014 Dec 6;24(12):3010-6.
13.
Yu,
T,
Zhu,
X,
Tang,
L,
Wang,
D,
& Saad,
N n.d.,
'Review of CT angiography of aorta',
Radiologic Clinics Of North America,
45,
3,
pp.
461-+,
Science Citation Index,
EBSCOhost,
viewed 29 December 2013.
14.
Ouwendijk,
R,
Kock,
M,
van Dijk,
L,
van Sambeek,
M,
Stijnen,
T,
& Hunink,
M n.d.,
'Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: Effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors',
Radiology,
241,
2,
pp.
603-608,
Science Citation Index,
EBSCOhost,
viewed 29 December 2013.
15.
Ofer,
A,
Nitecki,
S,
Linn,
S,
Epelman,
M,
Fischer,
D,
Karram,
T,
Litmanovich,
D,
Schwartz,
H,
Hoffman,
A,
& Engel,
A,
'Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: A prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography',
American Journal Of Roentgenology,
180,
3,
pp.
719-724,
Science Citation Index,
EBSCOhost,
viewed 29 December 2013.
16.
Devapalasundaram A,
Lau KK,
Paul E,
Mak L,
Ardley N,
Buchan K,
Kuganesan A.
‘Liver detection algorithm: Its efficacy of image noise reduction in liver’ Abdominal Radiology 2016;41(3):493-9.
17.
Johnson RC.
Dual energy CT: General principles. AJR 2012;199(5):S3-S8.
18.Ofer A,
Nitecki S,
Linn S et al (2003) Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: A prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(3):719-724.