1. Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Martin SS, et al. Review of clinical applications for virtual mo-noenergetic dual-energy CT. Radiology 2019; 293:260–271
2. Yuan R, Shuman WP, Earls JP, et al. Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonary angiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: comparison with standard CT pulmonary angiography—a prospective randomized trial. Radiology 2012; 262:290–297
3. Godoy MC, Naidich DP, Marchiori E, et al. Single- acquisition dual-energy multidetector computed tomography: analysis of vascular enhancement and postprocessing techniques for evaluating the thoracic aorta. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34:670–677
4.Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Martin SS, et al. Review of clinical applications for virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT. Radiology 2019; 293:260–271
5.Agrawal MD, Oliveira GR, Kalva SP, Pinho DF, Arel- lano RS, Sahani DV. Prospective comparison of reduced-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic im- aging dataset from dual-energy CT angiography with standard-iodine-dose single-energy CT angi- ography for abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR 2016; 207:[web]W125–W132
6.Patino M, Parakh A, Lo GC, et al. Virtual monochromatic dual-energy aortoiliac CT angiography with reduced iodine dose: a prospective randomized study. AJR 2019; 212:467–474
7.Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Koprowicz KM. Dual-energy CT aortography with 50% reduced iodine dose versus single-energy CT aortography with standard iodine dose. Acad Ra- diol 2016; 23:611–618
8.Shuman WP, O’Malley RB, Busey JM, Ramos MM, Koprowicz KM. Prospective comparison of dual- energy CT aortography using 70% reduced iodine dose versus single-energy CT aortography using standard iodine dose in the same patient. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:759–765