1. Ainsbury EA, Dalke C, Hamada N, Benadjaoud MA, Chumak V, Ginjaume M, Kok JL, Mancuso M, Sabatier L, Struelens L, Thariat J, Jourdain JR. Radiation-induced lens opacities: Epidemiological, clinical and experimental evidence, methodological issues, research gaps and strategy. Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106213. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106213.
2. Brown NP. The lens is more sensitive to radiation than we had believed. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;81(4):257. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.4.257.
3. Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Ahonen SM, Kortesniemi M. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):117-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12763.
4. Harbron RW, Ainsbury EA, Barnard SGR, Lee C, McHugh K, Berrington de González A, Edyvean S, Pearce MS. Radiation dose to the lens from CT of the head in young people. Clin Radiol. 2019 Oct;74(10):816.e9-816.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.029.
5. Kutanzi KR, Lumen A, Koturbash I, Miousse IR. Pediatric Exposures to Ionizing Radiation: Carcinogenic Considerations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 28;13(11):1057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111057.
6. Tan JS, Tan KL, Lee JC, Wan CM, Leong JL, Chan LL. Comparison of eye lens dose on neuroimaging protocols between 16- and 64-section multidetector CT: achieving the lowest possible dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):373-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1327.
7. Jaffe TA, Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Lowry C, Ravin C. Radiation dose for routine clinical adult brain CT: Variability on different scanners at one institution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):433-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3957.